Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - View Single Post - ICS System, Any Good?
View Single Post
post #6 of (permalink) Old 03-22-2009, 10:48 AM
Veteran Member
killclimbz's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 11,339
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Originally Posted by Mosquitobug View Post
It seems to me that having two mounting points potentially creates a pivot point on the board. I understand the binding is flat against the top of the board, but under heavy stress, when rocking back and forth, it seems that having at least three mounting points would do more to prevent any movement.

On the other hand, it doesnt ever seem to be an issue with wakeboards. Although Im not sure they take nearly the pressures/load of a snowboard.

I wonder if this will become a more common system industry-wide, or has Burton set this up to remain proprietary? Lack of options is too limiting for me. I love my '08 Burton Supermodel, and was disappointed that it was only available as ICS in 2009.
The pivot points are the biggest problem that I have seen with that system. It creates groves in the binding that make it perma pivot, no matter how hard you tighten them down. Seems to take about 20-30days of solid riding to get this to happen. The only reason Burton came up with ICS is because their craptacular 3d system patent has run out. Instead of getting with the program Burton decided it's better to make a system that only work with their products or forces other companies to liscense it.
killclimbz is offline  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome