Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - View Single Post - Women's "specific" bindings - does it matter?
View Single Post
post #2 of (permalink) Old 02-12-2014, 01:39 AM
The Swiss Miss
neni's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Swiss Alps
Posts: 5,848
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 975 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 4
Highback hight could be the main problem as some men's bindings have higher highbacks. Too high and it could bite your calve.

I've ridden some men's bindings with no problem at all (e.g. Burton Diode, Spark Afterburner) whereas some did bite (e.g. Rossi XV, K2 Company) even though the binding otherwise fit the boot and I'm not short.

Second thing is the width. As many brands dont have a men's S size, the M could be a bit wide, depending on your boot size. Bring your boot along when you look for bindings in a shop.

The women's specific padding is overrated (marketing) IMO. Most comfortable bindings I have are the Afterburners which is no women's "specific" binding, and the '14 Burton Escapade which has no padding at all anymore on the ankle strap and love them: comfy and responsive.
All this padding in other bindings reduces responsiveness and urged me to crank the straps even harder, squeezing off circulation. I'm not doing this with the Escapade anymore; really like the way Burton went.

I really thought quicksand was going to be a much bigger issue in my life when I was little

Last edited by neni; 02-12-2014 at 03:43 AM.
neni is online now  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome