Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - View Single Post - 2011 Lib Tech Jamie Lynn, 2011 Lib Tech Travis Rice, 2011 Never Summer SL
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2011, 12:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
Nolefan2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 410
Default 2011 Lib Tech Jamie Lynn, 2011 Lib Tech Travis Rice, 2011 Never Summer SL

Wrote this in another place, but just some thoughts here. Preface, I am 5'11 180, and have an 11 boot. Rode Breckenridge and Keystone. Not as organized as other reviews, but just wanted to throw some thoughts out there, for anyone who was curious.

****

I demoed both the Jamie Lynn, and Travis Rice (both 157) for 2 full days. Split time each day, to really make sure things were all equal and fresh in my head, because I was trying to make a decision.

Thoughts: The Jamie Lynn was definitely faster than the Travis Rice. It has to be if you think about it. The Lynn is set back a little bit in stance, and is a directional board, while the Travis Rice is a true twin. They both have a flex of 7, but I'd say that Jamie Lynn was slightly less stiff.

The Jamie Lynn performs better in powder because the nose is up, versus the blunted board on the Travis Rice. If you bought the pointy 161, it will probably outperform the Jamie Lynn in powder, but if you bought blunted, it was definitely sinking more for me. Someone once told me, you should be able to make any board perform well in powder. I can't dispute that. Both boards would be good if you were good, but it's EASIER on the Lynn.

The magnatraction is less aggressive on the Lynn. This is one complaint I had. On steeps, the Rice just held. But with the Jamie Lynn, I found myself not counting on it after I washed multiple times. It was pretty cruddy up top the last day at Breck, and you could really see the Jamie Lynn struggle at times.

The Jamie Lynn was pretty similar to the Travis Rice in terms of pop. The Jamie Lynn also was more stable flat basing than the Travis Rice, and I think this had to do with the set back in stance, but maybe someone more tech savy can help answer why.

I can also say, the Jamie Lynn rides longer than the Travis Rice, if that makes sense. I am 5'11, 180, with an 11 boot, and I felt on steeps like I was wishing the Travis Rice was longer, but didn't have that same overwhelming feeling with the Jamie Lynn. Both boards were 157.

Overall, I just found the Jamie Lynn more versatile. Faster, better in pow, a little more flexible, although I wouldn't recommend it for jibbing, it still could lap a little in the park. It flat based a little better, and was less squirely IMO than the Rice. And, it would ride a little better on groomers because the board didn't feel as "short" as the Travis Rice, despite being the same length. The major negative I had, was that I wished the magnatraction was the same as the Rice.

****

Hell, might as well add the Never Summer SL. Had this guy for a day, and switched in and out with the Jamie Lynn. I also rode a NS Heritage a couple months ago, but I don't think it's fair to compare when you didn't have it on the same conditions, and you don't have your thoughts fresh in your mind.

The SL (158) is a great board for some, but not for all IMO, like many suggest on this board. It wasn't for me. That being said, here were my thoughts.

The construction on this thing is pretty special. Very well built, and you can feel it on the mountain. The board is a tank. And there is good and bad that comes with that.

The good is that it plows through everything. Felt good through the crud at the top of the mountain, and just blasted through the hard packed. Locked in well, and was the most damp board I felt out of all the boards I have tried. It gives you confidence when you charge (the Heritage is even better here, that carbonite topsheet really dampens the ride - best charger freeride I have ridden - and that includes the Turbo Dream).

The downside - it's a tank. It was significantly heavier to me than the Jamie Lynn, Travis Rice, Turbo Dream, Raygun, etc. I found the agility of the board was the worst of the bunch. Turn initiation, movement in the trees, going down some bumpy runs that were ungroomed, I just found myself wishing I was back on the Jamie Lynn or T Rice at that point. Very curious to see if the Proto is the solution here.

Speaking of a tank, I really feel the Never Summer SL is great for someone still learning, and needing confidence to begin really bombing runs. It will give you that. Almost zero chatter, just plows through everything, and makes you go faster than you might have gone on other boards. But as a more experienced rider wtih groomers, and trees, etc, I like feeling more of the hill. The Jamie Lynn, and Travis Rice were damp enough that they never really chattered to the point that I noticed, BUT, I felt more in tune with the hill. IE - when I was riding correctly, I knew it, when I was riding poorly, the hill let me know.

Golf analogy - great golfers prefer forged irons because they know when they miss hit. Beginners prefer the ultra forgiving clubs, because they like feeling good about every shot. I feel as someone who gets very confident flying down a hill, I prefer to feel a little bit more to know when I am not riding as cleanly - make sense?

Back to the SL, it was about the best in the powder out of all the boards. Jamie Lynn was pretty damn close. Turbo Dream was damn good too, again however, rode on a different day with the Turbo Dream, so there was no side by side comparison on the same runs, same conditions, and memory is foggy since I rode the Turbo Dream in December of last year.

I am not a huge park guy, so the SL didn't get a lap through there. I road trees, bumps, groomers, off piste, etc.

Anyway, would take any questions about these boards. Hopefully this helps

Last edited by Nolefan2011; 04-07-2011 at 12:07 AM.
Nolefan2011 is offline   Reply With Quote