Originally Posted by Slush Puppie
Sounds plausible enough. But assume for a minute that your are correctly interpreting the whole context. Part of the problem (and it's a major one) is that it does rely on interpretation at all. How can you say my interpretation is incorrect?
To be fair, most if not all laws are open to interpretation. It's been 200+ years and we're still seeing cases in the Supreme Court regarding the interpretation of the Constitution.