Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - View Single Post - 2013 Lib Tech Banana Magic impressions / review is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Single Post
Old 12-07-2012, 10:29 PM   #20 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Originally Posted by someguy View Post
Very interesting. So I guess I should better be buying a LibTech TRS or Attack Banana. You guys also recommended GNU Rider's Choice to me, but I think I prefer the LibTech boards. I can't quite explain why, but the fact that more LibTech boards are recommended as top-boards makes me think that they produce better boards and have more experience in general. I know that they belong together at Mervin, but maybe there's still a difference.

So when those two boards are shortlisted, which one of them is a little bit more suitable and which size would you take?

- LibTech TRS 157 (minimum rider weight 58kg)
- LibTech TRS 159 (minimum rider weight 63kg)
- LibTech Attack Banana 156 (minimum rider weight 61kg)
- LibTech Attack Banana 159 (minimum rider weight 63kg)

I weigh about 70kg and together with my clothes and equipment I'm far over the 63kg, so I tend to get 159 length.

@hktrdr & @GreyDragon:

Both of you said that 1 (TRS) and 4 (RC) are best and that 3 (AB) is only second-best. Why is that? Could you please explain why you think that TRS fits better to me than Attack Banana? I need to know more about the thing TRS vs. Attack Banana. I feel like I can pull the trigger soon, but I need some more information before spending that much money. :-)

By the way, what do you think about my proposal to combine that board with a Rome 390 Boss and Burton Ions? At the moment I use Burton Cartels with Salomon Maori boots.
GNU boards are just as well/badly constructed as Lib-Tech. Zero difference. Many people would consider the RC to be a slightly upgraded TRS.

I picked those two over the AB because the camber profile-flex combo is better suited to groomers IMO. The AB has more rocker in the profile which helps with float in powder and turn initiation/looseness. However, to avoid it becoming to squirrelly/unstable on hard (like the Magic, which has more rocker) Mervin increased the stiffness resulting in less playfulness, pop, andvbutterability.
Accordingly, for mostly groomer riding I would go with the TRS/RC for playfulness and pop, while the AB is better for off-piste because of the float in powder and the extra stiffness.

Last edited by hktrdr; 12-07-2012 at 10:31 PM.
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
» Recent Discussions
Which of these freeride...
11-29-2015 04:35 AM
Last post by skirabbit
Today 09:40 AM
15 Replies, 431 Views
Boarding with glasses?
Yesterday 05:56 PM
Last post by cbrenthus
Today 09:39 AM
6 Replies, 99 Views
Tree fear
11-29-2015 08:46 AM
by 5forty
Last post by deagol
Today 09:28 AM
38 Replies, 991 Views
New edge tech: Sidecut...
Yesterday 10:12 PM
by jtg
Last post by Mystery2many
Today 09:13 AM
5 Replies, 117 Views
Edge tuning
11-29-2015 01:07 PM
by yoav
Last post by tanscrazydaisy
Today 09:07 AM
15 Replies, 291 Views
Oh look a survey
Yesterday 12:26 PM
Last post by trapper
Today 09:02 AM
22 Replies, 353 Views
replace laces or not
Today 08:53 AM
by dabears
Last post by dabears
Today 08:53 AM
0 Replies, 1 Views
Today 05:05 AM
Last post by Donutz
Today 08:52 AM
2 Replies, 37 Views
Arbor Bryan Iguchi 156
Yesterday 11:36 AM
by Nivek
Last post by Judokick
Today 08:38 AM
11 Replies, 219 Views
Pow board size?
Today 08:37 AM
by Quandom
Last post by Quandom
Today 08:37 AM
0 Replies, 15 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.