Originally Posted by Sassicaia
The problem with the VT incident is this
Those are the two weapons used, and the guy who didnt it didnt give a shit if he lived or died. He wanted to kill as many people as possible, so he would have done it if people had guns or not.
Without access to those to hand guns, there would be no reason to arm people to protect them selfs against people who have those.
The logic here is making me ill.
Are you blind to any type of reasoning? Guns aren't the only method of killing people. You don't think he wouldn't have used a different tool? Assuming he couldn't get a hold of some guns on the black market(if they were outlawed)?
Again with the logic you use we should ban anything that has the capability of killing someone, because if we do that then all murders will stop. right?