Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums - View Single Post - John McCain
Thread: John McCain
View Single Post
post #6 of (permalink) Old 10-15-2008, 09:53 PM
baldylox's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
If he meant what I think he meant then the figure is pretty accurate. Except that the percentage that pay 0 or negative income tax is higher.

A quick google search gave me these numbers:

%37 pay 0 or negative income tax
%42 of taxpayers pay higher payroll tax(FICA) than income tax
%74 of taxpayers pay higher payroll tax than income tax if you include the portion paid by the employer as part of that figure, which it technically should be.

(payroll tax is about %15 btw)

I am assuming what he is pointing out is that since A LOT of FICA isnt really used for social security/medicare, the majority of that should be reclassified as income tax. Especially since FICA is capped for earners who make over 100K. So the real percentage paid to government for any type of tax for the middle class is actually quite a bit higher than for the wealthy. Obama and McCain when they talk about tax increases / cuts are only talking about income tax.


Payroll tax - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Forgotten Payroll Tax - Gregory Bresiger - Mises Institute

Guess Who Really Pays the Taxes — The American, A Magazine of Ideas

Media Matters - O'Reilly's tax falsehoods: 50 percent "don't pay any federal income tax," estate tax "unconstitutional"

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by baldylox; 10-15-2008 at 09:59 PM.
baldylox is offline  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome