![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 9,178
|
Not all companies have Voile's labels. I tend to agree with Shred too. Though I do firmly believe as group as a whole, we are responsible for bringing awareness to the table. If the end user chooses to ignore it, then I am okay with it. Hopefully it doesn't bite them in the ass. If it does, I tried. Hence my involvement with FOBP.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 1,388
|
Yea I agree with Wolf. If you are on a ridge line over and someone triggers a slide you would go help them right? Sucks that they did that to themselves, but I know I would change plans and opt to help the party in trouble.
__________________
The journey of me becoming an Ironman and earning the M-dot tattoo http://ironmaninthesnow.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 9,178
|
Too be honest, I have yet to run into somebody on a splitboard that doesn't have some basic knowledge and isn't carrying any gear. Not saying I wouldn't help. Already been there done that in several situations. If you look at the accidents from last season, most of them were caused by people who had education, gear etc. You can't just blame the uninformed. As easy as it is.
Again, my attitude is to lead the horse to water. If they don't drink, that is not my fault. You can't force people to make the smart choice. Of course dropping in on top of me on an avalanche slope could very well get that person killed, and there is a good chance it wouldn't be by an avalanche... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
|
I'm not sure if anyone else actually read the article, but the industry is basically making a decision to combine its resources and knowledge in an effort to improve upon information and resources available to the BC accessing public.
Its making it a goal to make the information and terminology more uniform (so you powderdorks can actually understand the terminology when you read or talk to someone about it) and provide it in a way that is consistent and more readily available. They also want to educate you on what resources are available to you, SO YOU CAN MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW before you go hike a snow covered ridge and kill yourself or others. This is good for the industry and for you. You still make the decision about how smart or dumb you want to be about BC safety. Cheers to a safe and snowy winter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Front Range
Posts: 9,178
|
Quote:
AK, I think that the direction is solid. It just seems to tread the line where maybe too much responsibility is being placed on the retailer. Yes they should have some basic knowledge and yes they should encourage awareness and education. Where they draw the line in important though in our sue happy country. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|