2012 Union SL Binding - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2012, 04:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 90
Default 2012 Union SL Binding

My woman bought me these for christmas so I'm almost obligated to like them.

Info:

Ridden with 2012 163 Bataleon Undisputed & 2012 157 Capita Totally FK'n Awesome sz. 9.5 Nike Zoom Force 1's @ 15/-12 for about 2 weeks, (half and half). Rode in all conditions ice, hardpack, powder, slush.

First impressions:
Light for Unions. Considerably lighter than forces. Highback is almost urethane flexy, easy to twist. Primer ("battleship") grey was a bad choice, they feel unfinished. The straps have some weird suede feel on the outside. The accelerator pedal and padding feel nice.


Fit/Comfort/Adjustability
Fit terribly at first—let me qualify that though, my boot wasn't fitting well, all straps were maxed even though M/L is supposed to work for 9.5s. They sucked, foot pain, pressure points, etc. I ended up switching my straps by buying some extras L/XL off a friend and then they fit perfect, I honestly think the strap is way undersized for the binding; they could have just as easily cored the shit out of it even more and kept the same comfort level. After switching the bindings were perfect, the base is just the right size for my ZF1's though it's a tight squeeze around the heel. As for adjustability, they're unions—tool required adjustment, one position for the ankle strap and two positions for the toe strap. I honestly love the ankle strap disengagement on unions and I don't really have too much trouble with the toe buckle... most of the time.

Flex:
It's a wonder of modern snowboard technology that these bindings allow such flex and still respond very well. Laterally, they provide good mobility while the torsional flex on the highbacks is equal or better than a pair of freestyle bindings.

Response and Ride:
These bindings are scapels with very quick responsiveness which is a bit boggling considering the flex—it's almost think and move responsiveness. I think the ride is impeccable, very good with easy edge to edge and effortless turn initiation that gives boards a lightning quick feel to them.

Dampness/Shock Absorbtion:
It's weird how much they took out of the binding in material and the SL's ability to still maintain dampness and shock absorbtion. They've got a way more comfortable ride than forces and border on burton shredbed shock absorbtion.

Summary:
If you can get them on sale, please do. They're great—unless you're on the border of sizes. Top 3 all mountain binding, forreal.

Last edited by 2813308004; 03-17-2012 at 12:00 AM.
2813308004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums