T.rice 164.5 binding setup help - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2013, 10:23 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
CERBERUS.lucid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Born'n'Raised. MAUI, HAWAII...currently passing through Cali
Posts: 235
Default

Surf=yes... I can understand it better by how your comparing it... So basically I lose maneuverability... I'm not to interested in doing flips and spins or rails... I actually thought this board would perform more like a longboard... just cruise it left to right...
Well I still wonder why they would put the specifications for this board at 140+lbs... sounds more like its meant for 190+
Thanks for that explanation

Quote:
Originally Posted by ridinbend View Post
I'm 215lb and I wouldn't even consider that size unless I was riding steep and deep. It just won't be fun. Have you ever surfed? Assuming coming from Maui you have. It's the difference between a longboard/funboard and a shortboard.
CERBERUS.lucid is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-14-2013, 10:33 PM   #22 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
ridinbend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bend
Posts: 749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CERBERUS.lucid View Post
Surf=yes... I can understand it better by how your comparing it... So basically I lose maneuverability... I'm not to interested in doing flips and spins or rails... I actually thought this board would perform more like a longboard... just cruise it left to right...
Well I still wonder why they would put the specifications for this board at 140+lbs... sounds more like its meant for 190+
Thanks for that explanation
I don't do rails or park either, but lived at the beach for twenty+ years before moving to the mountains. And with my surf experience I still like a board that whips and snaps and does exactly what I would want to do on a wave.
ridinbend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 10:34 PM   #23 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Mystery2many's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Atlanta ga
Posts: 1,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CERBERUS.lucid View Post
I'm sorry I keep on coming back to this, but I am curious as to why they would rate this board for people with the weight of 140+ lbs.? As I said my weight is 165lbs. without any gear so I'm sure I would weigh in at 170 suited & booted up, yet everyone here seems to agree this is to big of a board? Just curious as to why if I do fall within the specified manufacturers weight specifications.
Thank you in advance for educating this curious man
I always buy/ride my boards near my limit or in the middle. They are more nimble and I control it, it doesn't control me. A big board is a lot to handle and is not as fun. This refers to all mountain freestyle riding and riding trees. Plus a larger board is meant to flex at a larger weight to flex ratio.


I think you should ride it and see for yourself. Personal experience is usually the best experience.

Last edited by Mystery2many; 11-14-2013 at 10:40 PM.
Mystery2many is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 06:21 PM   #24 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CERBERUS.lucid View Post
Yeah that last photo resembles how mine is looking…Please LMK how it rides when you get a chance...Im really curious, I want to try riding this 164.5 to gain some of my own insight on what a big board will respond to, but at the same time I would sell it if the deal was right so I don't want to actually put any miles on it. I think it would sell better if it was in mint condition you know. These last couple of nights i've been trying to understand the dynamics of such a wide board & from my understanding its just less playful in the sense that it is just heavier/bigger... Im new to snowboarding but I've always preferred bigger sized boards from surfing to long pintail skateboards. Basically I prefer the cruise, cutting from left to right... I'm not to interested in jibs and spinning etc., but I also don't want to feel like I'm riding a log.
I tried my 161.5 out today, wear a size 9 boot and felt more stable at high speeds compared to my 155 v-rocker. Felt a little more cumbersome in tight trees but that could partially be due to this being the first ride of the year for me. So far I have no regrets adding this board and cannot wait to try it in some powder.
T-MAC100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2013, 07:08 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Irahi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 230
Default

Size is all about preference and a little bit about purpose. You have an opportunity to see whether you like a really big deck, so why not take it?

For reference, I have a size 7 foot and ride a 157 trice as my freeride board. The width isn't very good on groomers, but is quite nice in variable terrain.
Irahi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums