Is there such thing as too much cant? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2013, 09:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Default Is there such thing as too much cant?

Hey guys,
Just got a new pair of rome 390 boss bindings, first time I've had canted bindings, and I had a weird thing happen after the first few runs. It's almost as if my leading knee locks up when I pick up speed, it's very hard to control. I don't really know if I was just leaning back to far because there was a lot of powder and just got off balance, or the cant, if it can even cause a problem like that? I have no idea, kinda why I'm asking. I run my stance a little on the wide side because my legs are huge, I'm 6'8", and I have the 3.5° foot beds in. Thanks in advance for all your help!
SoldierMed68W is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-24-2014, 08:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoldierMed68W View Post
Hey guys,
Just got a new pair of rome 390 boss bindings, first time I've had canted bindings, and I had a weird thing happen after the first few runs. It's almost as if my leading knee locks up when I pick up speed, it's very hard to control. I don't really know if I was just leaning back to far because there was a lot of powder and just got off balance, or the cant, if it can even cause a problem like that? I have no idea, kinda why I'm asking. I run my stance a little on the wide side because my legs are huge, I'm 6'8", and I have the 3.5° foot beds in. Thanks in advance for all your help!
I was wondering the same thing. I recently bought the 390 bosses and had the 3.5 in. I also have Burton ruler boots which also feel somewhat canted. I am going to try the 2.0 next to see if I feel any difference.
sdm74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2014, 08:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
cav0011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 794
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Yes there can be to much canting. The goal is to align your knees, when the angles are too much it makes them go out of alignment again
cav0011 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2014, 09:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cav0011 View Post
Yes there can be to much canting. The goal is to align your knees, when the angles are too much it makes them go out of alignment again
What do I want to align my knees with?
sdm74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2014, 03:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
SuCoSlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bama
Posts: 46
Default

From an anatomical geometry standpoint, it is ideal that the footbed be at a 90deg angle to your leg, laterally. When a stance wider than the hips is used, then the angle isn't 90 degrees anymore. Canting seeks to make up for the difference in angle. This assumes the board is flat. A rocker board would partially make up the difference, lessening the need for canted bindings, if not eliminating it altogether. A cambered board would need a binding with more canting to make up the difference, when compared to a flat board.

All that being said, I rode a cambered board for several years without canted bindings and never felt the need for canted bindings. This was before the days of rocker. Or canted bindings for that matter.

If I had to choose between no cant or too much cant, I'd go for none. Not saying canted bindings aren't good. They are. But if you get the feeling it's too much, then it probably is.
SuCoSlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2014, 04:01 PM   #6 (permalink)
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
CassMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Whitefish MT
Posts: 1,921
Default

those look sweet...is it possible to stack more than 1 cant pad?
CassMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2014, 07:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuCoSlayer View Post
From an anatomical geometry standpoint, it is ideal that the footbed be at a 90deg angle to your leg, laterally. When a stance wider than the hips is used, then the angle isn't 90 degrees anymore. Canting seeks to make up for the difference in angle. This assumes the board is flat. A rocker board would partially make up the difference, lessening the need for canted bindings, if not eliminating it altogether. A cambered board would need a binding with more canting to make up the difference, when compared to a flat board.

All that being said, I rode a cambered board for several years without canted bindings and never felt the need for canted bindings. This was before the days of rocker. Or canted bindings for that matter.

If I had to choose between no cant or too much cant, I'd go for none. Not saying canted bindings aren't good. They are. But if you get the feeling it's too much, then it probably is.
Thanks for that tip
sdm74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 09:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 116
Default

Last year I got canted (Salomon women's Absolute Premium) bindings. My back leg hurt riding them so I swapped out the canted foot plates for flat ones from old bindings.
sb60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 03:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
East§ide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 922
Blog Entries: 1
Default

FWIW, my fiance got canted bindings on her NS Pandora, going from Burtons - the cant made a huge different for her (she's arthritic) and really alleviated alot of knee pain.
I also have canted bindings, however mine is Burton Cartel Re:Flex with Autocant footbeds.. similar concept but a different approach.. The footbeds sort of mold to the angle of your boot to give you a cant without a predetermined angular degree... basically the foam is harder on the outside than the inside, allowing your boot to squish into it as much as is needed, rather than having the footbed impose a degree of canting on you.
__________________

Never Summer Evo 153/Restricted ReFlex Cartel
Gnu Danny Kass 156 BTX
East§ide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 03:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by East§ide View Post
I also have canted bindings, however mine is Burton Cartel Re:Flex with Autocant footbeds.. similar concept but a different approach.. The footbeds sort of mold to the angle of your boot to give you a cant without a predetermined angular degree... basically the foam is harder on the outside than the inside, allowing your boot to squish into it as much as is needed, rather than having the footbed impose a degree of canting on you.
Yup, Flux also has that tech in a lot of their footbeds. Haven't been able to decide if I like it or the pre setup cant more. The pre mold feels more consistent but if you have the right weight distribution on the "autocant" style they seem to dial in a little more precise, at least from my experience.
lab49232 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums