fast in binding for burton channel - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2014, 06:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18
Default fast in binding for burton channel

lets say I am intermediate snowboarder with couple of seassons on the slope. Mostly ride grommers, pow only few times a year(best time on the board ).
Currently have:
custom board 165w
custom EST bind L
nitro anthem size 44
and i am looking for new soft binding for my setup, becuase this burton EST binding in size L is just too big for boot size 44(10uk,11us). I do like the barefoot feeling with my EST, but otherwise my size of boot is small for L size and probably too big for M (haven't tested it yet). And also this strap bussines again and again on small slopes is killing me. I am very intersted in binding, which are ease to strap like SP, FLOW, GNU. Which one to choose for burton channel or should I stick to EST binding?

Last edited by roleta; 01-28-2014 at 06:44 AM.
roleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-28-2014, 07:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Resident poet
wrathfuldeity's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bham
Posts: 4,857

Another option (very cheap)....a cord between the ratchets...take a look at the thread below. Also if you have a long toecap strap/ladder you can put a pin at the end of the ladder so that buckle/straps do not seperate...thus slip in the toe of the boot and ratchet down...go.

Last edited by wrathfuldeity; 01-28-2014 at 07:17 AM.
wrathfuldeity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 08:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18

if you mean this:

for me it is not problem to get off the board but to get in (on the small slope it is realy annoying and boring..)

roleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 08:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moving to the dark side...
Kevin137's Avatar
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Drammen
Posts: 1,414

Does a 44 require a wide board...???

Or did i read it wrong...???
Height 5"11, Weight 200-210lbs, Born 1969
Regular Stance, Ability NOT GOOD

2012/13 114 days
2013/14 102 days
2014/15 107 days


K2 Fastplant 154, Ride DH2 158, Endeavour Vice 155, Signal OG 155, NS Evo 157 (Stolen), Flow Quantum 155
Kevin137 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 09:02 AM   #5 (permalink)
Veteran Member
hardasacatshead's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Aussie living in London
Posts: 689

I was just thinking the same thing.

WTF are you doing riding a 165W with size 10 boots?

Most guys around the size 10 boot mark will float around the 160-200 lbs area (give or take, there's no science to that so don't get all forum nazi on me - where's HKTRDR?). So unless you're a burly fella then a 165W is likely to be a gargantuan board. If you're a big bloke then you might be ok.

In terms of bindings, I guess Flow bindings are often considered one of the easier ones to get in and out of. I haven't used them though and don't know too much about them so I'm not going to be much help to you there mate.
hardasacatshead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 09:14 AM   #6 (permalink)
Veteran Member
john doe's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,411

SP and GNU are the same thing and I personally think that Flow does everything better. The standard Flow mounting disk works with 4 hole, Burton 3 hole, and Burton channel.

2011 Smokin Buck Ferton 155
2013 Flow NX2-SE
2013 Flow Hylite boa
Burton Stagger pants/jacket
Smith I/O
john doe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 09:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18

this is my first board, I bought it over internet with my friends "advice", becuase at that time I have shitty oversized shoes (2sizes bigger). I am not such big dude, but no more in teenage years and > 200lbs for sure and high about 6"2' . I was thinking about selling that setup, because sometimes I find my board too big, thats true. So your suggestion is to go for completly new smaller gear?

So flow binding for this year are easy to mount on burton channel? Whitout any special plates?

roleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 10:25 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18

And what do you think about this one?

in video:
Flow Fuse-SE Snowboard Binding |

is seen that it is compatible with burton channel.
roleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 11:22 AM   #9 (permalink)
Veteran Member
atr3yu's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nelson, BC
Posts: 732

Originally Posted by roleta View Post
And what do you think about this one?

in video:
Flow Fuse-SE Snowboard Binding |

is seen that it is compatible with burton channel.
Those are softer Flows, being right in the middle of their flex scale, 2.5 out of 5. I have recently been looking at Flows as well and will say that they do appear to be the best step in bindings out there. Also from my research they all come with a disk that is Burton channel compatible. I say pull the trigger!
atr3yu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 11:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
larrytbull's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,059
Blog Entries: 6

can't speak to the Fuse-se, I have the next round up the Nx2-se. I have owned the rest of the pack in easy bindings. They all will work with channel.

My notes on the different brands-

1. K2 cinch CTX- these are the easiest to get in, but closing the binding is a whole other story these open up really large higher than flow or GNU, but the latch takes tons of work, I found my forearms aching by end of the day latching them in. They are canted (like this ) and also are heavier. they also allow you to strap in with ratchets or click in. Honestly if they were not so hard to click in i would have been very happy with them. I still have them on my rock board

2. GNU - I tried these and really wanted to like them, I tried both the Street and the Weird. The weird just a bit better. My main complaints are Build Quality, They feel much cheaper than flows or K2's. My other complaint was that in opening the back, the latch seemed to always get in the way of allowing the back to come down enough the get in the binding on a pitched slope. and my #1 complaint was the toe cap, there is no rotation at the toe cap, it moves front to back but not up or down. if you boot does not perfectly fit in toe cap, you are always adjusting it to cover boot toe.

3. FLow - Currently I have the NX2-SE. These are really well made. they have the features I was looking for, canting, eva beds, Side entry option (old skool).
The backs open lower than either k2 and GNU. They seem a little heavier than the GNU's but lighter than the K2's (not scientific may just be my perception). My biggest complaint with them is that the heel area where the heel cup attaches to binding is a bit on the narrow side, so to enter the binding you will need to angle the TOE in first, even Using thier boot. They also took me a little longer to dial in. I am still working on correct placement on board now (personal preference and limiting some toe hang, my arbor formula is a bit on narrow side) These are my favorite so far.

Hope this helps you in deciding if easy entry is right for you.
larrytbull is online now   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums