![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So at the begging of this season I picked up a Banana and mounted it with 390s. My riding has advanced quite a bit over the past 2 months. I realized that I wanted something more all mountain that I could really bomb a hill and hit kickers at high speeds with. I picked up a Bataleon The Jam. Triple8sol had recommended a Jam to me before, and maybe I should have listened the first time around.
As it's more of a all mountain to freestyle board, I figured some Targas would serve it well. I really do love my 390s. I'm hoping the Targas compliment The Jam as a stiffer version of the same binding, able to handle the speed and variable terrain a bit better. Before they become used, I was hoping for some confirmation that this is the case. Also, are the C-inserts worth switching out? The ankle strap is obviously much more flexible with no insert at all, but the 2 different C-inserts don't really feel that different in rigidity. Board and binding porn attached below! ![]() ![]()
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
I rode my Jam with Targas the first 10 times out this season. Perfect combo that served me well locally as well as in Tahoe and at Bear.
__________________
14 NeverSummer Proto HD . 13 Never Summer Cobra . 12 Gnu Rider's Choice C2PTX 14 Now Drive . 13 Now IPO 13 NB x 686 580 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 389
|
Ok so what is the deal with the inserts? I got Targas for my Lib Tech T.Rice C2 BTX and love them but did wonder about the inserts. The instructions didn't give a hell of a lot of detail on them. Is one set supposed to be stiffer than the other?
Edit: Hmm look at that...you go to the mfg web site and read about the tech and it tells you what's what. So yea one set is supposed to be stiffer...I may have to try it...but honestly I love the feel of my Targas right out of the box. Last edited by Grasschopper; 02-09-2010 at 09:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 582
|
nice setup, tylernim. Maybe just an optical illusion, but it looks like you're riding all the way in the backseat...expecting some epic pow?
I have Targas mounted on my Undisputed and 390s on my Riot. Among other things, Targas have an actual dampening system under the heel...much appreciated after a few jarring rock drops. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 422
|
I've tried both inserts in mine, and can't tell a lot of difference. I stuck with the stiff inserts for whatever reason. The prior years' models seemed to have a more noticeable difference between the 2 inserts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
As for the seemingly massive setback, it's just the difference in angles of the board against the wall and the camera. That and the standard set back of a little more than half an inch on the board. I've got my bindings mounted with the wholes matched up etc... |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 649
|
I don't wanna start a new thread... So which is the better binding for a pure park setup? I'm looking for a new set up bindings for my 157 Burton Twin and I'm deciding between these two. I don't care much for an all terrain setup, strictly park with a lot of flex. Thanks!
__________________
East Coast Park Rat 2008 Burton Twin 157 w/ Rome 390 Boss 2005 Burton Canyon 168 w/ Ride LS "its ppl like you, that I would "impact damage" your face if i ever saw you keep your mouth shut. one more time, please and thank you." -user: chingy_ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|