k2 formulas vs rome 390s - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-28-2010, 04:44 PM
shoter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
k2 formulas vs rome 390s

hey guys just wondering which bindings would be the best for an intermediate rider. Going to be riding mostly park and no pipe. Mostly jibbing and jumps. What do you guys think? I'm just looking for good stable bindings that wont be too heavy and something i can jump jib with and jump with freely, at the same time being durable.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-29-2010, 10:14 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,493
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
I would recommend the 390 Bosses. 390's with a cantbed and some other added wizzers.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-30-2010, 12:17 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both are great bindings. The Formulas are stiffer than the 390s, so if you're looking for a jibbing/jumping binding, by far the 390s.
DC5R is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-30-2010, 12:39 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
I would recommend the 390 Bosses. 390's with a cantbed and some other added wizzers.
I concur 390 bosses best binding I've ridden to date hands down.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-30-2010, 06:02 PM
Veteran Member
 
LTshredTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
I concur 390 bosses best binding I've ridden to date hands down.


how would u say the 390s are for all over the mtn. riding? also do they have a toe strap or regular, i didnt know?
LTshredTN is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-30-2010, 08:09 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Between the two I would probably say k2 Formulas if you want an all mountain binding and the rome 390's (specifically, as everyone said the boss) if you want a true park binding, which it sounds like you do.
Snowfox is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-30-2010, 09:50 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Regular 390's from this past season are softer but a bit heavier than the Formulas for this past season. Now if we're talking 2011 product 390 boss is where you want to go for all mountain versatility unless you like a high back that comes over your boot then go with the new Formulas.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-31-2010, 03:57 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
Regular 390's from this past season are softer but a bit heavier than the Formulas for this past season. Now if we're talking 2011 product 390 boss is where you want to go for all mountain versatility unless you like a high back that comes over your boot then go with the new Formulas.
So if I was going to have a "whole mountain as the park" type of board then you would suggest the 390 bosses?

Apologies, I was under the misimpression that the Formulas would be stiffer.
Snowfox is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-31-2010, 07:02 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 390s are park bindings you can ride around the entire mountain whereas the formulas probably more mountain bindings you can take to the park. This is my comments on the current year bindings (ie 2010 models) as I haven't seen any of the 2011 gear on the shelves. BA, on the other hand, has crazy access to equipment, so if he says you can take it all mountain, he's probably right.
DC5R is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old 07-31-2010, 07:07 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
People don't realize they're 2 differently constructed bindings that offer 2 entirely different things. The highbacks on the 390's are softer laterally due to how they're milled out while the Formula's (2010) were designed to be stiffer on the outer and softer on the inner so when you drove into a carve you had support but when you jibbed it would give. Also 390's are 2 part construction with metal heel cups and plastic bases where as the formulas are a unibody construction. Toe straps are shaped different and designed for 2 different types of boots. The heel straps are also different as the 390's is softer and has gel in it while the formulas has plastic. But come 2011 everything I said just gets blown out of the water completely.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome