Flow bindings question... - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-14-2010, 10:12 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Flow bindings question...

So I have a few seasons and a few boards under my belt now, but I have just kept the same Flow bindings for each board through each season.

I have noticed a majority of pros don't use the Flow bindings.

I like the ease of getting in and out, and they are pretty comfortable (I don't have much to compare them to though) to me.

My question is why don't the pros use them (minus the Flow team riders)?

Are they just heavier or just not as comfortable or what?

I just got a pickle and was thinking about new bindings.

Thanks
cadencesdad is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-14-2010, 11:16 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,347
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadencesdad View Post
So I have a few seasons and a few boards under my belt now, but I have just kept the same Flow bindings for each board through each season.

I have noticed a majority of pros don't use the Flow bindings.

I like the ease of getting in and out, and they are pretty comfortable (I don't have much to compare them to though) to me.

My question is why don't the pros use them (minus the Flow team riders)?

Are they just heavier or just not as comfortable or what?

I just got a pickle and was thinking about new bindings.

Thanks
Hi Cadencesdad,

Your question has a lot in it. The top pro snowboarders are typically fully sponsored and have board, boot, binding, clothing, accessory, and out of industry sponsors. They are not only given specific gear but they are paid to ride it. That is not to say that they do not love the gear that they ride on (many have design input as well), but it is probably fair to say that there are other motivations at work there.

Now for the average Joe paying customer. Flow is the second largest binding company (the first is still Burton), so when riders are choosing with their own money...

Flow bindings have a unique feel, extra entry options, and Flow puts a lot of cash and effort into developing and improving their product. If you have even a two year old binding by any of the top makers (including Flow), I would suggest demoing a set of Flow 2011's. This is an insanely refined product. Still, no one type of binding will appeal to all riders. Demo if you can.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Wiredsport; 10-14-2010 at 11:19 PM.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #3 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-14-2010, 11:55 PM
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I rode flows in years past. they are convenient... what i see alot of is kids love the idea of flows but it tends to be something they grow out of. (not size wise but more performance) as you demand more performance out of your baord and bindings.... flow seemed to lack in the sense that a traditional strap in would. their bindings these days may prove me wrong becuase im not super up to date on them...

its a love hate thing... ride what you like. jsut dont buy clickers.

BUCK FURTON

Last edited by zk0ot; 10-15-2010 at 10:29 AM.
zk0ot is offline  
post #4 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 07:22 AM
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm sorry zk00t, I still love you bro (no homo), but I don't like your comment one bit.

Here is the thing, two year old Flows are extremely old tech-wise. Flow is one of those companies that drastically improve from year to year. 2010 and 2011 Flows have been drastically improved from all years prior.

The responsiveness comment is also misleading. People always make it seem like Flows offer very little response. This is flat out wrong. In actuality, Flows offer better edge to edge power transfer from binding to board. Where Flows lose in the response category is the other types of movements such as side to side. You know, like when you are pressing out your board, spinning, etc... And that is in fact due to the strap design. Even then, Flow has refined their straps. Their I-Flex strap is awesome and offers the most responsiveness to date (in the Flow line).

By no means does Flow restrict you from doing any tricks or carving out some aggressive lines. It's just that traditional bindings make it slightly easier.

The huge pay-off from Flows isn't the ease of entry. It's the comfort. Hands down, there is no competition in the comfort department of bindings. Flow's caps are designed to distribute pressure evenly on your feet. This means greatly reduced foot fatigue. Now this is very noticeable. Of course, if you ride real mellow and only for a few hours then this isn't really important. But if you're like me and like to ride aggressive for long periods, then there is a huge difference.

I still love traditional bindings (I'm getting 390 bosses this season), but Flow gets a bad rep around more "core" snowboarders. Some of you guys are brutal man. Too often I hear about riders trashing Flows because a pair from 2007 was uncomfortable or heavy. Too often I hear about riders dogging Flows because their friend's 2006 Flow Flites broke. Then there are those powder junkies saying Flows are impossible for snow surfing days not knowing that Flow has since released a mini-ratchet system to completely resolve this issue. Their newer SE line took that solution a step further while also making the set-up process a complete breeze.

I always recommend Flows for people looking for the most comfort out of their bindings. The speed of entry is only good for riders who are uncomfortable bending/sitting down to strap into traditional bindings or people that shred mostly on small hills.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reviews and David Z's rants
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Leo is offline  
post #5 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 07:45 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
neednsnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
I'm sorry zk00t, I still love you bro (no homo), but I don't like your comment one bit.

Here is the thing, two year old Flows are extremely old tech-wise. Flow is one of those companies that drastically improve from year to year. 2010 and 2011 Flows have been drastically improved from all years prior.

The responsiveness comment is also misleading. People always make it seem like Flows offer very little response. This is flat out wrong. In actuality, Flows offer better edge to edge power transfer from binding to board. Where Flows lose in the response category is the other types of movements such as side to side. You know, like when you are pressing out your board, spinning, etc... And that is in fact due to the strap design. Even then, Flow has refined their straps. Their I-Flex strap is awesome and offers the most responsiveness to date (in the Flow line).

By no means does Flow restrict you from doing any tricks or carving out some aggressive lines. It's just that traditional bindings make it slightly easier.

The huge pay-off from Flows isn't the ease of entry. It's the comfort. Hands down, there is no competition in the comfort department of bindings. Flow's caps are designed to distribute pressure evenly on your feet. This means greatly reduced foot fatigue. Now this is very noticeable. Of course, if you ride real mellow and only for a few hours then this isn't really important. But if you're like me and like to ride aggressive for long periods, then there is a huge difference.

I still love traditional bindings (I'm getting 390 bosses this season), but Flow gets a bad rep around more "core" snowboarders. Some of you guys are brutal man. Too often I hear about riders trashing Flows because a pair from 2007 was uncomfortable or heavy. Too often I hear about riders dogging Flows because their friend's 2006 Flow Flites broke. Then there are those powder junkies saying Flows are impossible for snow surfing days not knowing that Flow has since released a mini-ratchet system to completely resolve this issue. Their newer SE line took that solution a step further while also making the set-up process a complete breeze.

I always recommend Flows for people looking for the most comfort out of their bindings. The speed of entry is only good for riders who are uncomfortable bending/sitting down to strap into traditional bindings or people that shred mostly on small hills.

Worddddd!!!!

Neednsnow.com:
Traveling the States and Taking Pictures
neednsnow is offline  
post #6 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 10:04 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,347
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
One thing that is awesome about Flow is that they listen to their dealers and to their customers. They heard the comments about their lower priced models and completely reworked the line right down to the Flite 2. Those bindings now have full Airframe ratchet side entry (quickset buckles on the opposite side), rear entry of course, a completely redesigned and reinforced top strap and a simplified single dial forward lean adjustment. Most importantly, they have shed weight and added rigidity to the baseplate and highback.

Sooooo...that should pretty well do away with the concept that lower end Flow can't hang. You can go $30.00 higher than the Flite 2 or Trilogy before you find a competitor's bindings that will compete.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #7 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 10:29 AM
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
i edited my comment a bit be less misdirecting...

BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline  
post #8 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 12:02 PM
Veteran Member
 
j.gnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: oxnard,ca
Posts: 551
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadencesdad View Post
So I have a few seasons and a few boards under my belt now, but I have just kept the same Flow bindings for each board through each season.

I have noticed a majority of pros don't use the Flow bindings.

I like the ease of getting in and out, and they are pretty comfortable (I don't have much to compare them to though) to me.

My question is why don't the pros use them (minus the Flow team riders)?

Are they just heavier or just not as comfortable or what?

I just got a pickle and was thinking about new bindings.

Thanks
as far as flows go the only real advantage they have over a traditional binding is the ease of access.
if you want to strap in super fast,be pretty comfortable and not expect much else out of your binding....stick with flows . if you plan on getting into the park and want a binding that will give you the most out of your board i would highly suggest you buy a new pair of bindings. you can get a lighter, more durable, more responsive binding that will do nothing but help your riding.

everyone has their own opinion as far as bindings go, but personally i think flows are pretty bad. you'd be doing yourself a disservice by not checking out different companies.

Last edited by j.gnar; 10-15-2010 at 12:10 PM.
j.gnar is offline  
post #9 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 12:12 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
neednsnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.gnar View Post
as far as flows go the only real advantage they have over a traditional binding is the ease of access.
if you want to strap in super fast,be pretty comfortable and not expect much else out of your binding....stick with flows . if you plan on getting into the park and want a binding that will give you the most out of your board i would highly suggest you buy a new pair of bindings. you can get a lighter, more durable, more responsive binding that will do nothing but help your riding.

everyone has their own opinion as far as bindings go, but personally i think flows are the worst bindings on the market

See, i knew something was missing last winter! If only Scott Lago had been riding non-flow bindings......his medal just might be a different color.

Neednsnow.com:
Traveling the States and Taking Pictures
neednsnow is offline  
post #10 of 30 (permalink) Old 10-15-2010, 12:13 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
neednsnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Doh, I jumped on ya prior to your edit.

Neednsnow.com:
Traveling the States and Taking Pictures
neednsnow is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome