![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 40
|
I've been a Union rider for years, but the Raiden Phantoms look pretty sweet. How do Raiden's compare to Union in comfort, dampening, durability, and stiffness?
I'm looking at the Raiden Phantom Vs. the Standard Force |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 5,369
|
The Phantoms will be stiffer, more damp, and in my experience more comfy.
I have been riding Union for 3 years and will be starting my switch to Raiden this next year.
__________________
Snowboarding Sucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 40
|
Good to hear Nivek!
The Raiden's really look like a solid binding, simple like Union, but maybe a little more tech. Raiden's just look lighter, but I know that means nothing and could be lead wieghts. The thing that has me looking at Raiden's is the adjustable heel, Flux were on my list too, DMCC and SF45, but the Raiden's just look solid with less parts to fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264
|
i saw a pair of raidens on sale for 70 so i grabbed em'. liking them so far the only issue ive had is the center plate has weirdly shaped indents for the bolts so that they can wiggle around a tiny little bit. doesnt affect anything, but just thought id say. i dont have the phantoms specifically but on the whole raiden seems to be pretty descent quality wise.
EDIT: the raidens dont have heel ramps, only toe ramps. dont know if youd need them my heel just hangs off a little |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|