forward lean on K2 Cinch, GNU, or Flow - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 10:06 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
forward lean on K2 Cinch, GNU, or Flow

Hi guys,
I have just started a search for bindings and wonder if the Chinch, Flow, or GNU have forward lean adjustments.
Which do?
Do any not have them?
Are any toolless?
Do any require tools?

I'm just looking for something with subtle forward lean adjustments depending on the conditions and style I want to ride and make some adjustments on the mountain. I'm not looking for drastic lean.
Thanks!
dknj is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 10:19 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,575
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Flows are a spin dial on the lever. I don't remember what Cinchs are, and I would guess Gnu's are similar to Flow.

Flows are generally just better. Fast isn't the selling point in my opinion, comfort is. The others are still just two strap bindings made heavier to accomadate a "faster" in and out. Flows are faster in and out, average weight, and they are far more comfortable.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is online now  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-17-2011, 11:16 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fast isn't a the selling point for me either. I get in and out of my current 5+ year old bindings as conveniently as anyone. I'm on the fence about the toe strap vs toe cap feature. The latter isn't available on Flows due to the uni-strap design to aid the entry position as far as I can tell. I don't have any problems without the toe cap now, but was thinking it would provide a slightly better lock-in.
dknj is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-17-2011, 11:19 AM
Veteran Member
 
Smokehaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NoVA
Posts: 891
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknj View Post
Fast isn't a the selling point for me either. I get in and out of my current 5+ year old bindings as conveniently as anyone. I'm on the fence about the toe strap vs toe cap feature. The latter isn't available on Flows due to the uni-strap design to aid the entry position as far as I can tell. I don't have any problems without the toe cap now, but was thinking it would provide a slightly better lock-in.
I love me some toe caps.
Smokehaus is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-17-2011, 12:43 PM
Veteran Member
 
lisevolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hicksville, NY
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have the Cinch CTX's for this year and they do have a forward lean adjustment. It's a bit of PITA because you have to adjust the cable tension when you adjust the forward lean so it's not something you can do on the fly like you can with the Flow's.

I went with the Cinch's over the flows for the exact reason you mentioned. I prefer to ride traditional strap bindings with a toe cap which the Cinch's have. However my one big complaint is that for this season they removed the full ratchets from the toe and it's now more of set and forget type of set up. Once you get them dialed you won't touch them but the first couple of days it's somewhat annoying. The flow's are the best rear entry design for sure, however I have never been a big fan of the uni-strap which is why I went Cinch.

As far as the weight goes, my Cinch's don't weigh any more than my Data's do...
lisevolution is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-17-2011, 01:17 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do you feel that the heal side turn on the Cinch is getting lift leverage more from the cable system or the high back pushing against the heel top plate. From pictures, it looks like the Flow cable is more mid foot and therefore the energy would be more neutral. Most of the energy is probably the rider, boot, and strap(s) anyhow.
dknj is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-17-2011, 02:12 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,575
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
My Quattros have better heelside performance than my Nitranes, Contacts, Data, and Force SL's did.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is online now  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-18-2011, 01:55 PM
Senior Member
 
GorgeDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hood River, OR
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For what its worth, I recently made the transition from traditional straps to Flow (NXT-FSE) and am definitely a fan. I found that despite the comfort fit, which initially felt like I wasn't "locked in", the heel and toe side response is awesome, likely due to the rockered baseplate.

As mentioned above, they also have a simple, tool-less forward lean adjustment.
GorgeDad is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 02-19-2011, 06:31 PM
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,980
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisevolution View Post
I have the Cinch CTX's for this year and they do have a forward lean adjustment. It's a bit of PITA because you have to adjust the cable tension when you adjust the forward lean so it's not something you can do on the fly like you can with the Flow's.

I went with the Cinch's over the flows for the exact reason you mentioned. I prefer to ride traditional strap bindings with a toe cap which the Cinch's have. However my one big complaint is that for this season they removed the full ratchets from the toe and it's now more of set and forget type of set up. Once you get them dialed you won't touch them but the first couple of days it's somewhat annoying. The flow's are the best rear entry design for sure, however I have never been a big fan of the uni-strap which is why I went Cinch.

As far as the weight goes, my Cinch's don't weigh any more than my Data's do...
My back toe strap sometimes comes undone, probaby because of drag when I push. And sometimes it moves frpm the top to the toe position for the same reason. Franklyy I never touched them after the initial setup/..you're not missing much.
Agree on the backlean. But love my CTXs so far.

2015/16 -17- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06 - 181K
KIRKRIDER is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome