![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: mt.
Posts: 270
|
i read recently on flow binding reviews forums that there's a guy that rides with a union binding on his forward foot and flows on the rear.how well would that work? would that depend on the flex of the bindings so the response would not be different? idk... has anyone else tried that set up?
__________________
2011 Ride Antic 163 2011 Status Focus 158 NX2-AT |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
NO real reason why you can't do it, but with that being said, I see no reason to do it. I think the response would probably be there (assuming they have roughly the same flex), but it would feel strange to have one foot strapped, and the other hugged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: mt.
Posts: 270
|
that is true, i guess the guy is from michigan and having small hills and short ride you'd get creative to get more runs .i'd say bravo! to that.
__________________
2011 Ride Antic 163 2011 Status Focus 158 NX2-AT |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|