flow 5 vs k2 cinch or other flows? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2011, 08:51 AM   #11 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
...your boot will not get all the way in.It will be resting on the highback. That is correct. From this position, pull up on the high back, and stand down on your heel. The boot will "shoehorn" into place....
As i said they were older flows ones. but this still sounds like a bit of wear will be put on to the boots. forcing boots into straps that should tightened down.
IDK thats my view of it....
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-13-2011, 09:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk0ot View Post
As i said they were older flows ones. but this still sounds like a bit of wear will be put on to the boots. forcing boots into straps that should tightened down.
IDK thats my view of it....
If you buy a good boot the wear is similar to the wear from the strap friction of ratcheting a conventional binding. The final slide in is only a few cm, but it makes a world of difference in support. As your boots break in you will need to snug the bindings down again once or twice. I have seen some boots get really beaten up by poor sizing. If the binding is too small and the plastic ladder straps are at their ends, then the slide in, which should be contacting only the base and mono strap can contact the hard platic ladder straps. As with all bindings, sizing is important.
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:08 AM   #13 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

true

10-chars
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:33 AM   #14 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
hikeswithdogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Minnesota Summer--Utah Winter
Posts: 967
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Flow's make great binders and the newest I've demo's is a 2009 model(NXT?) but I just never felt as "locked in" as I did with traditional 2 strap bindings. Once I got my Cinches last year uber cheap(120$) on clearance I'll probably never go back to anything else(until I build a split board), I feel as locked in or more so than any bindings I've ever ridden. Yes they are slightly heavier and yes they have more moving parts but I have like 60 hard days on them without issue and have no interest in going back to anything else.

Just for a point of reference I'm one of these guys that likes their bindings so tight I normally go through multiple ratchets and ladders a season but now with the cinches I don't ever have to worry about those "wear" issue. I used to ride K2 AutoEvers which I liked but I kept breaking the steel cables from over tightening so now their backups. :-(
hikeswithdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 9,522
Default

Cinches suck ass!
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 10:38 AM   #16 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardy Har View Post
I have been thrilled to see the discriptions on the flow 5 bindings but have also read both good and bad reviews on them as well.

however i have read they are good all-mountain bindings and are unfortunately bad in pow and major mountain riding aka cliffs and deep pow?

K2 has the cinch and i have been tempted to go with the standard dual strap systems. but want an expert opinion before commiting to them. i just cant trust product distributors(3rd party) product reviews.
Love my CTXs, in deep pow you can use them as a regular binding.

http://www.snowboardingforum.com/equ...cinch-ctx.html
__________________
2013/14 -12- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 10:44 AM   #17 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
hikeswithdogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Minnesota Summer--Utah Winter
Posts: 967
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
Cinches suck ass!
Please elaborate I've had zero issues nor has the other 2 riders I know and were in and out of our binders as fast or faster than others in our crew with flows.
hikeswithdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 03:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Hardy Har's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Diego(for now)
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
Flow every single year improves their bindings. Sometimes they improve drastically. Comparing a pair of 2005 Flows to a 2010 and above is like comparing two totally different bindings from different companies with the only similarity being the look.

Sorry for the dissertation. As a long time Flow user, I have a lot to say about their bindings
I really enjoyed the entire quote leo!!! i have had you post on multiple of my threads and you have been an extreme help. i was looking at the 5's on sale and was like wow thats awesome.

but i appreciate it alot. like i have said in multiple threads i look to grow into an advanced rider and the way you described the flow nxt/at's made alot more sense. thanks a bunch
__________________
Hardy Har
Hardy Har is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 03:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ShredTaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 115
Default

I've ridden flow and cinch. They were both alright but I really like regular ankle tow straps much more. The flows were 2010 models, their all mountain binding NXT-AT. Here's a few things noticed. They aren't fun to set up, you cant swap boards with your bro's easily, if this is something you like to do stay away. Once they are setup they work well, and actually did cut time off getting strapped in after getting off the lift. Riding them, once finally dialed in, they felt good. Pretty solid. Their weight, they weigh more than my 2009 model ride delta mvmnt bindings by a noticeable amount. And the biggest pet peeve for me with those bindings were in the powder. They are SO hard to get into and actually take 3 times longer than regular bindings in powder. So if you hike a lot of terrain, or ride tons of pow i wouldn't recommend them. BUT for if you are riding groomers, and never swapping gear, they are great- and faster than standard bindings.

The cinch i only rode once, one a groomer day so i dont have as much input. But for some reason i wasnt a huge fan of those either, same with GNU's binding system. It might just be me but i trust the tightness that i feel when strapped in with a conventional binding.
ShredTaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 04:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Default

I just don't understand the powder complaint with Flows. That reputation should have died out once the mini ratchets were implemented.

Just release the two outer buckles and strap in like any other traditional binding in powder. Problem solved.
__________________
www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums