2012 Flows? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 05:33 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2012 Flows?

Hi I snowboard up in michigan so no big riding although I may take a trip to colorado over winter break. I was wondering if anyone has a review on the 2012 flow nxt fse bindings. I ride the terrain park and since the hills are so small its nice to be able to get in and out of the bindings quickly for more runs. However I don't want to sacrifice performance for easy access. I am trying to improve my terrain park abilities this year. Let me know what you guys think about this binding. My other go to binding would be the raiden zeros instead. Thanks!
johnnymac is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 06:21 PM
Veteran Member
 
ThunderChunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kissing Bridge
Posts: 1,817
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't own Flows, so I can't personally say they are bad. I do know people who have them and they are far from what they're portrayed to be. I can actually strap in the same amount of time my friend can who has flows. Other than having the convenience factor they are not that great of bindings. I would look elsewhere, but it's up to you. It's you who is buying and riding it, not me. Many people on these forums will probably tell you the same thing too.

Quote:
Im all for having fun, showing your tits and getting fucked up on a river float but it can be done without being a pig.
ThunderChunky is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 06:49 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,615
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
I ride Flows and defend them when needed. They are solid well done bindings with better than average edge to edge performance.

I would look into M9se's, Fives, and Quattros. They're in order stiffest to softest. Though When I say stiffest, the M9se's are about a midlex park binding.

Fives are closer the Zero's. Those are a solid option if you want to just stick with traditional bindings and were going to be my choice for this year. Though I do also own this years M9se's.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is online now  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 07:33 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Would you says the flows are better than the zeros if you take out the factor of being faster to get in and out of? and are the three you listed better than the nxt fse for the price id be paying?
johnnymac is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 08:15 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,615
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
FSE's are what my bro Jordan rides to drop corked 9's at Keystone. You don't need those.

Deciding factors for me between the two? Raiden has my favorite dampening/shock, Flow's are the most comfortable bindings I've been in and are just as responsive as anything else.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is online now  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 08:24 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the help Nivek, always a pleasure.I rode flow quattros last year and enjoyed the experience but I have not ridden traditional bindings in years and was wondering if i was missing out. I think I will stick with the flow lineup for now.
johnnymac is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-2011, 08:28 PM
Drunk with power...er beer.
 
Donutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 5,133
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderChunky View Post
I don't own Flows, so I can't personally say they are bad. I do know people who have them and they are far from what they're portrayed to be. I can actually strap in the same amount of time my friend can who has flows. Other than having the convenience factor they are not that great of bindings. I would look elsewhere, but it's up to you. It's you who is buying and riding it, not me. Many people on these forums will probably tell you the same thing too.
Well, that's one POV. Now for another. I own NXT-AT's and Fives. I also own or owned Burton Missions, Salomon something-or-others, and Cinch's. I'm an intermediate rider, and more of a downhiller than a park rat, so take that into account as well. Anyway, the Flows are from what I can tell exactly what they're portrayed to be. I've not noticed a loss of responsiveness. In fact, over the course of the day the Flows are less likely to make my feet ache. The NXTs are better than the Fives, which is what you'd expect when you pay more. Actually the crappiest bindings were the Cinch's IMO. As far as strapping in, I come off the lift, kick my back foot in, and snap the binding shut without ever stopping, let alone sitting. I've never seen anyone with traditional bindings do that, although I suppose it's possible in principle.

The big problem with Flows if you're in the park a lot is not quick entry, but convenient entry in random situations. If you're on a moderate slope with Flows, you have to turn to face the hill to snap in. That's a PITA, and depending on the layout of your park you may find it much easier to sit and crank standard bindings.


Illegitimi non carborundum.
Donutz is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome