New Bindings: Uprise v Phantom v Targa? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2011, 02:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 4,672
Default

nivek would you imply that the uprises are as soft as to be jib specific? i am NOT a jibber, pretty much all-mountain resort rider, kickers, side hits, back bowls when there is snow. i currently have ride contrabands and feel that they have very little response, lots of play, and would only be good for jibbing.

not looking for the ultra stiff ever, plus the 100buck difference seems nice, but i dont want to get uprises and find out i got another super soft unresponsive binding like the contraband.

was pretty much set on the uprises till i read what u said about them being a soft formula. care to elaborate?
__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-25-2011, 06:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
Companys are stiffer overall. Stiffer but not heavier means more $$.

Airbags are my personal favorite dampening system in bindings. All the shock absorbtion you need but not so damp you lose feel.

Second to that is harshmellow and if you have bad knees Companys will be better than Phantoms being canted.
Hmm, i'd forgotten about the Phantoms not having canting.

I wouldn't say I have bad knees, but they're not great, and I am fairly tall and ride with a wide stance (I like to think it helps spread my weight out more in deep powder), so I was thinking the canting would be a good idea.

Is the canting good enough to rule out the Phantoms due to their lack of them? I guess put another, is the Phantoms shock absorption that much better than the Harshmellow system on the K2s to warrant losing canting?

I was leaning towards the phantoms (plus I like the look of them the best), but now im looking at the Companys cos I don't know if I want that auto-tech anyway.
Zakal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 09:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 6,280
Default

Its really up to what kind of binding feel you want. Metal frame and plastic base with mini disc is just going to feel different overall than unibody plastic with standard discs. They achieve they same spot in the market but feel very different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowklinger View Post
nivek would you imply that the uprises are as soft as to be jib specific? i am NOT a jibber, pretty much all-mountain resort rider, kickers, side hits, back bowls when there is snow. i currently have ride contrabands and feel that they have very little response, lots of play, and would only be good for jibbing.

not looking for the ultra stiff ever, plus the 100buck difference seems nice, but i dont want to get uprises and find out i got another super soft unresponsive binding like the contraband.

was pretty much set on the uprises till i read what u said about them being a soft formula. care to elaborate?
They are not a jib specific binding. Honestly the softer feel is something that people like me and BA notice, but might be hard to feel or not noticable for most others. If you're worried about it just get Company's.
__________________
Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friend

Also, buy my things?
http://www.snowboardingforum.com/buy...ml#post1737634

Last edited by Nivek; 11-25-2011 at 09:52 PM.
Nivek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 12:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 4,672
Default

cool


tyvm.

__________________
Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 11:49 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Default

Ive all but made up my mind to get some of the Companys, but I can't find any of these around locally (Australia) to get my hands on and look at, so I sent someone I know in Tahoe around to the local shop to have a look, and hopefully to try a pair of my boots in the bindings to make sure there's no size issues.

Something in particular I was looking out for was this "suction" effect on the K2s that Angry Snowboarder was praising, but mentioned that it may have been to do with his pairing of the Companys with his K2 boots. I don't have K2 boots, so I wanted to check it still fitted okay.

When my mate got to the store, one of the shoppies told him to look at the Rome 390 Bosses instead saying they were stiffer than the Companys.

Now, from what I've read, both in this thread and in other reviews etc, that is not even remotely correct. Rome seem to advertise the 390s as being middle of the road on their "poppy/buttery" scale (which i presume is a stiffness/flex scale), and most other reviews ive seen refer to teh 390s as being a park binding of average stiffness.

I don't really ride park at all. And whilst I wouldn't mind getting better at it and perhaps doing it more, im not about to buy a set of bindings suited to that more than what I actually do ride. Which is normally speed runs focussing on turns on groomed days, or powder on snowy days.

As far as my riding approach is concerned, its all about powder, and ive tried to set up all my gear for that. Everything else is just playing in between powder days, so if im not fully equipped to take on the park, so be it.

So the Companys are a better choice for me than the 390 Bosses right?
Zakal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 12:03 AM   #16 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mt. Bachelor
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zakal View Post
...what I actually do ride. Which is normally speed runs focussing on turns on groomed days, or powder on snowy days.

As far as my riding approach is concerned, its all about powder, and ive tried to set up all my gear for that. Everything else is just playing in between powder days, so if im not fully equipped to take on the park, so be it.

So the Companys are a better choice for me than the 390 Bosses right?
Given how you ride, maybe the K2 Ever is worth the extra $50 over the Company? I have a set of Auto Evers (now named Ever) and a set of Auto Uprise (which look like the Company but with the Auto feature) and for freeriding similar to you I like the Evers a bit better. The lack of highback padding is not noticeable since I have a thick boot on, but the frame feels stiffer and I really like the Auto feature.

Last edited by Toecutter; 12-05-2011 at 12:06 AM.
Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 12:21 AM   #17 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 6,280
Default

more often than not shop kids are knowledgeless dimwits. This is no exception. Companys are stiffer. Go for those.
__________________
Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friend

Also, buy my things?
http://www.snowboardingforum.com/buy...ml#post1737634
Nivek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums