Binding Angle Stance Help - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 03:39 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Binding Angle Stance Help

I've done tons of searching here and on Google, and I understand this is mostly a trial and error setting. I also understand there are some basic starting points as well as certain stances geared more for certain styles of riding.

I am a first year rider who can take the single blacks without issue unless it's a sheet of ice, so my skills are there. I grew up skateboarding, water skiing, wake boarding, and some surfing.... and I've been boarding 3 times a week since November so all of that helps.

I ride a Rossignol Taipan with Salomon F22 boots and Burton Cartel bindings. I ride regular, not goofy. I'm 5'8", 190 lbs. I don't ride park at all, but this weekend because of the conditions found my self going off the trail, up on tall ledges, and hitting small jumps here and there. Riding switch here and there for a very quick moment. Just playing around..

My first setup was a 22 3/4" stance width with a +12 or +15 (can't remember) front foot and a -3 back. When riding a straight I would feel myself trying to bring my front foot, at the time I thought, in. So I adjusted my binding angle in, to a +9. This is where I've been riding for the last two months (+9/-3) and my skill is constantly getting better. This weekend (awesome conditions) I was really hitting it hard and found my self exerting too much effort in transitions on the steap slopes, which resulted in sliding not carving. I think I was using my upper body to initiate and that I'd over compensate resulting in a slide after which I'd correct into a proper edge decent. This wasn't a slide to slow down and then continue decent this was, as said above, an over exertion into the turn. Does that make sense?


I got to thinking about it and that's when I did some more reading. I'm now thinking that my stance width was/is too wide, and that maybe I could have corrected that uncomfortable front foot feeling not by changing the front angle but instead by narrowing my stance width, which would also allow for easier maneuverability from edge to edge.. so I read.


So last night I moved my stance width in to a 21". Should I leave my angles at the +9/-3? I set them up at a +9/-9 but now I'm thinking maybe I should leave where they were and see what narrowing the stance width did for me. If I'm correct and that was the feeling of wanting to move my front foot in, that would allow me to open up the front foot some more and maintain the comfort. Once the front's dialed then I could open the back a bit so as to allow some play ability but not sacrifice main passion of carving.

Any help/opinions ? Sorry for the long post but I wanted to convey the entire situation to help you help me
pdxrealtor is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 03:44 PM
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Mostly personal comfort and style of riding. A steeper angle in front is more comfortable for me when I want to carve (+21/+15) on hardpack. More relaxed generally (+18/+12) or +15/+9 in a powder day. Try and experiment.

2015/16 -9- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is online now  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 03:48 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KIRKRIDER View Post
Mostly personal comfort and style of riding. A steeper angle in front is more comfortable for me when I want to carve (+21/+15) on hardpack. More relaxed generally (+18/+12) or +15/+9 in a powder day. Try and experiment.
Wow... thanks for the quick reply.

That's an aggressive back foot... I'd have to work into that slowly, but I think that would leave play days out of the picture. I'm thinking I want to open my back foot up a bit.

What's your height/weight/ stance width?
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Irahi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxrealtor View Post
Should I leave my angles at the +9/-3?
That seems like an awfully closed stance to me. You've only got a 12 degree difference between your front and rear leg, which (for most people, anyway) is a very awkward stance and reduces your ability to naturally flex your knees. Most recommendations will put you closer to a 30 degree difference between your front and rear foot, so if you wanted to go with the same ratio, you'd be at more like +18/-6 or -9.

Regardless, you should give angles with a slightly wider spread a try, it should feel quite a bit more natural.
Irahi is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 04:26 PM
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
It's easier to carve since your knees are both facing forward. 5.10 / 150lb / 21.5" whatever feels more comfortable for you.

2015/16 -9- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is online now  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 04:43 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irahi View Post
That seems like an awfully closed stance to me. You've only got a 12 degree difference between your front and rear leg, which (for most people, anyway) is a very awkward stance and reduces your ability to naturally flex your knees. Most recommendations will put you closer to a 30 degree difference between your front and rear foot, so if you wanted to go with the same ratio, you'd be at more like +18/-6 or -9.

Regardless, you should give angles with a slightly wider spread a try, it should feel quite a bit more natural.

Thanks... I totally think my wide stance, 22 3/4", was the problem here. I'm only 5'8"

I think I was trying to close the front foot when I should have been closing the stance! Dag nabit!
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 04:49 PM
Veteran Member
 
KIRKRIDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Yep..it sounds like a bit too wide

2015/16 -9- Kirkwood days
Arbor A-Frame 158 2009-10
Jeremy Jones Hovercraft 156, 2011/12
Burton Driver-X
K2-Cinch-CTX
Subaru WRX 06
KIRKRIDER is online now  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-21-2012, 05:11 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
So should I leave the stance angle the same knowing I adjusted the width, sticking with the adjust only one thing at a time rule. Or in this situation you guys think it'd be safe to put the back foot at the -3 and adjust the front foot back to a +15 and go from there?

I just put on my boots and stood on the board and I'm really leaning towards the latter (+15/-3)... but I always like to hear what people have to say.

Ultimately if I don't notice my steap slope boarding suffering I'd like to open up my back to -3 to -6 from the front, so I can ride switch and play around at will.
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-22-2012, 07:21 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
pdxrealtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Anyone on that last question?
pdxrealtor is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 02-22-2012, 07:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Irahi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd widen your angles for sure. 18/-9 is pretty common for mostly-freeride-but-also-likes-to-ride-switch kind of people, but anything on the wider side should feel more comfortable than the 9/-3 you've been running.
Irahi is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome