![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 72
|
I got a pair in today definitely no canting atleast not from what i can see this whole auto canting does not work like the reg stuff from what I hear, I don't wanna throw them on and then realize it don't do nothing then I'm stuck with them :-/ they should advertise this as a 2.5 degree canting system
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ/NYC
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Hell, I didn't notice the bindings at all. Exactly what I want from a binding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ/NYC
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Liked them both (the EX more). I definitely noticed the canting on the SPIs and was aware of it on the EXs -- especially when switching out with no-cant bindings. I am riding the same stance width (which I can't recall at the moment) +12/-12 with the Cartels. What can I say, I don't notice the canting, but definitely don't feel the discomfort I used to get with a non-canted binding. So, hocus-pocus or otherwise, the auto-cant works (at least for me). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 5,373
|
I think auto cant is more or less for landings and high pressure. If you're just standing in it or just riding around you probably aren't really engaging it that much. But upon landing that inside section is going to collapse easier keeping the torque off your knees.
__________________
Snowboarding Sucks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|