Step ins, need recommendation please - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 12:25 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Step ins, need recommendation please

I was holding my friends board the other day and notice how much lighter his is. Granted he has a traditional strap system and titanium and I have Step ins.

But I'm getting a second board and want to stick with step ins. It's better on my back than hunching over all the time to strap in.

I currently have the K2 step ins from 2009/10.

Anyone have a recommendation for a great step in binding that is light and durable?

Thanks

(Demo'd the gnu and wasn't so happy with them.)
B-Line is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 12:52 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
FacePlant4Free's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East Coast, PA
Posts: 244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
so... Flow?

Park Pickle / GNU Chice

1
FacePlant4Free is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 12:59 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FacePlant4Free View Post
so... Flow?
I'd also recommend trying flow. You'll have to bend down for like maybe a second to strap in each time. Step-in bindings suck compared to regular. There's a reason that nobody uses them.
Rookie09 is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 01:28 PM
Veteran Member
 
Oldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Too Far from Real Vertical
Posts: 733
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Go Flow
Oldman is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 01:42 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rookie09 View Post
I'd also recommend trying flow. You'll have to bend down for like maybe a second to strap in each time. Step-in bindings suck compared to regular. There's a reason that nobody uses them.
I see a lot of people using them. I also see a lot of manufacturers making them now that never made them before.

Previously it was just Flow. Then K2 started making them, even Gnu/Lib has gotten into the action.

The only people I really hear down talking step-ins are people who haven't ridden on them. But everyone who rides on them love them.

Granted, I'm not saying they are the highest performance. But in terms of comfort and ease of use, I've found they work great and hear it echo'd all the time from other step-in riders.

And if having a system that takes a notch out of performance but gives me an extra hour or two of pain free riding, I think it's a worthwhile trade off.

Anytime I've demo'd traditional snowboard bindings, I have a much less enjoyable day.

Last edited by B-Line; 12-04-2012 at 01:45 PM.
B-Line is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 01:44 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldman View Post
Go Flow
I know Flow's are popular especially cause they were the first to push the system. But when I was outfitting my board in 2010, the salesman really pushed me hard into the K2 instead of the Flow.
I love the K2. I know it's a binding I can re-buy. I'm just exploring other options.
B-Line is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 02:05 PM
Drunk with power...er beer.
 
Donutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 4,972
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 244
I'm not positive about this, but we may be having terminology issues here. When you say "step ins", I wonder if some people are thinking of those click-in plate bindings. Flows and Cinch are more often described as "rear entry" or preferably "quick entry" since the first phrase just set some comedians off


Coffee is your friend. Everyone else is an acquaintance.
Donutz is online now  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 02:05 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You're really talking about a rear entry binding. Step-ins/clickers are a totally different binding type and an utter failure made by Shimano, K2 and a few others..
bseracka is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
 
HoboMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donutz View Post
I'm not positive about this, but we may be having terminology issues here. When you say "step ins", I wonder if some people are thinking of those click-in plate bindings. Flows and Cinch are more often described as "rear entry" or preferably "quick entry" since the first phrase just set some comedians off
Yes, the first thing that popped into my head were those god awful click-in bindings with no highbacks that I had when I was 10 .

If anyone still actually uses those, please unscrew them and proceed to throw them in the nearest trash can.

PowderHound and TreeNinja
HoboMaster is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 12-04-2012, 02:15 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-Line View Post
I see a lot of people using them. I also see a lot of manufacturers making them now that never made them before.

Previously it was just Flow. Then K2 started making them, even Gnu/Lib has gotten into the action.

The only people I really hear down talking step-ins are people who haven't ridden on them. But everyone who rides on them love them.

Granted, I'm not saying they are the highest performance. But in terms of comfort and ease of use, I've found they work great and hear it echo'd all the time from other step-in riders.

And if having a system that takes a notch out of performance but gives me an extra hour or two of pain free riding, I think it's a worthwhile trade off.

Anytime I've demo'd traditional snowboard bindings, I have a much less enjoyable day.
I see what you mean. I thought you were referring to the old click-in bindings that nobody uses. I totally misunderstood that. I know K2 has the Cinch, Gnu has the Fastec, and obviously the flows. They ride a little different than standard bindings but overall are still good. I'd still recommend Flow over any of those other brands if you're set on getting rear entry bindings. They've been at it longer and it seems like they're ironed out more of the problems compared to the other companies.
Rookie09 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome