![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,463
|
Quote:
![]() That's okay, my new board arrives today. As long as the UPS truck doesn't blow up nothing could ruin this day!!! ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,463
|
Quote:
Bindings for Boardercross Seems like people use a little of everything... There is a point of diminishing returns. A board and boots can only be so stiff, putting something TOO stiff on the board may not feel any better than stiff freeride bindings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 723
|
Quote:
I have not used the Machines as they were seriously too stiff for me (i weigh 265/270lbs) so i bought the phantoms for great responsiveness and some forgiveness when i fuck up. IMO for all the features they offer and the comfort you cant go past the machines, the CATEK just don't seem to have the same range of features for a similar price.
__________________
my names's Petey and i have gigantic balls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
However, I would not recommend it to most people because the design doesn't have the ergonomics features found in the bindings made in the last 5 years or so, so they aren't quite as comfortable. Frankly I don't think anyone really needs that much customization in cant... (1*,2*,2.5* is probably plenty). Front/Back Lift (i.e. like an adjustable toe/heel ramp) is actually kind of nice... but again, not an essential feature for 99 percent of riders. I think the Catek FR2 Pro Evo as like a Ferrari. Mostly for people who have ridden a lot of bindings, like to go really fast, have a lot of money, and are looking for something "exotic." However, much in the in the same way a Ferrari or a McLaren is high-performance, expensive and exotic, and probably not the car you want to go buy groceries with, or pick up your kids at daycare - this binding is definitely overkill for "soccer mom" snowboarders. Last edited by lonerider; 12-10-2012 at 03:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
Well, the Union and C3 guys I talked with last season all said the Charger is absolutely the stiffest binding that Union makes and sells. I guess they could be wrong, but somehow I doubt it. It definitely was the stiffest Union binding I rode. I don't know that I would go so far as to call it the stiffest out there, but I absolutely would say that it is the stiffest in the Union line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
Those look like the most uncomfortable binders on the planet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
In any case, the Chargers might be very well be the stiffest Union binding (note that I did not claim otherwise), but they sure as hell are not the stiffest bindings in the market. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|