![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
Ok, tested the 390 Boss (2012) a couple days. Am I crazy, or is this binding quite responsive? From everything I've read, I was expecting a softer but still all mountain binding.
For comparison I rode K2 Uprises, Malavitas and Raiden Blackhawks last year, all 2012 except the Uprise (2011). I was expecting the 390 to slot in between the Vita and Blackhawks, since the Blackhawks were supposed to be a stiffer binding. But I feel they are stiffer than the Blackhawks. Difference is this year I'm riding a westmark, last year I was on the Coda, so a slightly softer board. I have tried not to ratchet down the strap but as soon as it's snug I can feel the response. I notice it the most when setting up for a jump (I only do small jumps do to my age ). I had no problems last year getting into an athletic stance, bending my knees. I do this to balance myself and force the board flat. Vita, Uprise and Blackhawk no problem. When I do this on my 390 boss and westmark it goes onto the toe edge. It's weird. I literally cannot bend my knees without the edge engaging.Is it just something I need to work on? Break the binding in? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 463
|
I find them a stiffer (medium flex) myself which I like but it sound like your high backs might be leaned forward a bit? Mine are as far back as they can go because I ride a lot of park. Otherwise I would say your probably leaning forward and not just bending your knees.
__________________
... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,752
|
I went from a contraband to the boss 390s and def noticed the difference!
New boots also, which probably changes things as well. That's weird, I have noticed that I've been jumping off my toes more (to my annoyance). Interesting you are having problems taking off flat too. Maybe try 'sitting' into it more? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
No forward lean, I can see the gap between my boot and the highback.
If I don't plan on any park features I'll usually up the forward lean a tad. But if I plan to hit any jumps I usually drop it all the way back. grafta, same boots here (32 lashed). I'll give it a few more days (Tahoe and Mammoth hopefully). But if this holds up, looks like I like a softer binding in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
Oh by the way, did not have toe strap issues. It slipped once my first day, but that's because I was still figuring out the right position. But now it's rock solid on the 32 lashed.
One issue is that the lashed are so wide they barely fit into the binding, same thing with my Uprises. No problems on the medium malavita though or blackhawks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
Quote:
I can bend my knees ever so slightly, but not to the level I could with the other bindings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 70
|
Is this a comparison of those other 2 bindings last year to the 390's this year? Have you used the Malavitas/Blackhawks this year to have a legitimate comparison?
Just basing this off of your "dUE to my age" comment, but flexibility/strength may have changed from the end of last year to now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
Quote:
Just don't want to break my back on a hand rail or big jump, but am still relatively athletic etc.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|