![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Snohomish WA
Posts: 295
|
Quote:
I have a set of Burton Prophecy, Malavita restricted (with the winged high backs) and a set of Cartels. I ride the Malavita's the most. Actually I put them on almost any board that I ride. They have just the right amount of flex, and I like the wings when things get deeper/steeper. The Genesis is taking over this year for the Prophecy, It is still a pretty stiff binding, but very comfortable and a lot more forgiving than the Diode. If you haven't ridden the Re:flex system, it is pretty great. Seems to make my boards feel a lot more alive and poppy. I will probably be on Burton binders for quite some time. They are fantastic.
__________________
11/12 Days riding: 63 12/13 Days riding 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,561
|
I've had two pairs of stiffer bindings than the Diodes (C60s) and now I use Diodes as my main bindings. I'm primarily a freerider in powder, glades, chutes, etc. but I do spend time working on my carves, and some time in the park too.
So far I'm happy with them, haven't had a crack yet but I'm very careful to fold the highbacks down before getting on the lift. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Drunk with power...er beer.
![]() |
Nothing. Flows are different. People don't like Flows for the same reason that people don't like Burton, or Microsoft, or IBM. Because it shows how core you are.
There's been any number of discussions about Flows vs traditional on this forum. The most anyone's ever come up with that's even remotely verifiable is that Flows may be slightly less responsive if you're pushing it hard. I have some specific complaints about Flows: they're terrible to get into in or out of in deep powder, and they're difficult to get into or out of on a relatively steep slope. On the other hand, they're a lot easier to get into standing up and you can with practice get into them without even stopping. Also they're WAY more comfortable over the course of a day. For the record, I've owned several sets of Flows, Burton Missions, and a couple of sets of Rome Targas. For cruising the groomers on Seymour I always use the Flows. If I end up back on Baker with Wrath and NW I'll be using the Targas.
__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum I hate the parts between winter... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 33
|
U need to have bindings that are dialed with your board and your boots for flex, etc. altho imo I think bindings are the least important factor of the three parts of the equation tho. I think Cartels are some of best bindings for the price.
Last edited by rambob; 04-22-2013 at 03:16 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
Second, your bindings must be matched up to your board and your boot. For example, if your bindings are to soft for your board; you will have difficulty flexing your board. If your bindings are to big for your boots, you will lose responsiveness. ... What's not important; the attitude that you can do anything because your friends make it look so easy. Believe me, I've seen a couple of friend go on trails above their skill level against my recommendation. They ended the day with more than a bruised ego. Hope this helps - Nito |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|