which bindings for my setup!? - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2013, 07:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Australia (QLD)
Posts: 45
Default

Thanks for all the feedback everyone, im taking the advice on board (excuse the pun)...im not riding till august so ill keep doing my research and decide to either re-sell it in AUS ( i could prob make money) or keep it.

If i feel it isnt the board for me at my level i can keep it and buy another one for japan in jan maybe as suggested i would be better with a NS proto (which i was considering before i read their website which states its a park board) or maybe the skate banana? Just as a side note the t-rice 153 (25.3cm) has the same width as both the attack banana and the proto ct which is 25.1...so i dont understand how it is a wide board?

In any case i need some bindings anyway...do you guys think the FLUX TT30 bindings would be good bindings for the t.rice or something softer if i went with that?
wedore is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:18 PM   #22 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
ksup3erb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 307
Default Re: which bindings for my setup!?

Don't know anything about Flux, sorry.

You could look into Ride Capo or El hefe.
ksup3erb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2013, 08:27 PM   #23 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
BigmountainVMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sugarloaf, ME / Philly
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty100 View Post
You would agree though there are many who ride this board who are not advanced that just prefer the feel of a stiffer board? It's not the case that riding this board as an intermediate is going to destroy your skills. If the OP likes the feel of a stiffer board and wants something that he could progress with then this might work very well indeed. Down the road, it could also be a very good steeps/powder option in a 2 board quiver...
I would respectfully disagree. This board needs a more advanced rider to handle appropriately. You may be able to progress on it, but progression will be slowed and inhibited especially with only 30 days under your belt. I would argue that with only that many days, what you think you prefer and what you actually need are two different things. The T. Rice is made for a few very specific purposes... it is twin tipped and stiff, made to land big jumps/booters both regular or switch. It is a good steeps/powder option, but only if you are into freestyle. If not, then you want a more directional board!

Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
Completely agree with these two. And to add, another (and actually possibly the biggest) problem with the T. Rice is the width - with size 8 feet the OP is really going to struggle to work the edges of this mid-wide board. T. Rice is a great deck, but definitely seems a sub-optimal choice for the OP
I sort of agree here. The T.Rice has a huge jump in width in its larger sizes. So the OP may not have issues with the width, but I would argue he would be more comfortable with something at exactly 25.0 cm or high 24s wide. For reference, I ride a 157 Proto with 25.3 waist and size 11 boots... no toe drag at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedore View Post
Thanks for all the feedback everyone, im taking the advice on board (excuse the pun)...im not riding till august so ill keep doing my research and decide to either re-sell it in AUS ( i could prob make money) or keep it.

If i feel it isnt the board for me at my level i can keep it and buy another one for japan in jan maybe as suggested i would be better with a NS proto (which i was considering before i read their website which states its a park board) or maybe the skate banana? Just as a side note the t-rice 153 (25.3cm) has the same width as both the attack banana and the proto ct which is 25.1...so i dont understand how it is a wide board?

In any case i need some bindings anyway...do you guys think the FLUX TT30 bindings would be good bindings for the t.rice or something softer if i went with that?
You say you have no interest in park or freestyle, but you seem to be leaning towards twin tip boards that are designed to be ridden switch in freestyle type situations. If you TRUELY don't ever want to spin or do anything other than straight airs, then you want a directional board, NOT a twin.

If you were looking at NS boards, just for reference, even the NS Heritage is a bit softer than the T. Rice, and even the Heritage is a stiffer board! If you are looking at the NS line, I would suggest the SL. It's nice and damp, so little to no chatter at higher speeds, and it is a directional twin, designed for a forward direction of travel but it can totally be used to ride switch if you ever get in to it. It also has a setback stance so you can move your bindings back on a powder day, something that doesn't work as well on a twin board, like the T. Rice. I still recommend the Lib TRS and the GNU riders choice... the GNU being a bit higher end than the TRS.

As for Flux bindings... I wish I had something to tell you there but I have no experience with them. The model you picked seems to have a good flex pattern but may be a bit heavy? The only other options were their 5/5 stiffness bindings and that might be overkill but I don't know how their bindings compare to Burton bindings, which I am a fan of and know much more about.

Last edited by BigmountainVMD; 02-17-2013 at 02:20 PM.
BigmountainVMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2013, 10:12 PM   #24 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
crash77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I would argue that with only that many days, [B
what you think you prefer and what you actually need are two different things.[/B]
I can attest to this. I have been riding for 4 yrs and it took me 2 yrs to figure out my riding style/preference. At first I just new I wanted to bomb every hill. However, due to my geographical shortcoming (MD), runs were only lasting 30 seconds. I quickly got bored with that. I'm 35 and the park/jumps were no where on my radar, but lo and behold...because of the hills I have access to I find myself jibbing, doing spins, butters, and now I'm even venturing into the park hitting boxes and rails. Just my 2 cents. Good luck!

(As stated in my previous post, my first board was a used 2010 T.Rice. Sold it (way too stiff for me as a beginner) and brought 2011 rossignol taipan, which I
locked in my fundamentals with, was given 2011 K2 Raygun that I began messing around with freestyle on and now I'm looking to get the 2014 Evo.
crash77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2013, 10:47 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
boarder22ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 29
Default

As far as width is concerned, I would say 25.3cm ww is still way too wide for a size 8 boot. The board I ride has a 25.2 ww and Im riding size 11 boots. Even with my 11s i have hardly any overhang and couldnt drag my boots if I tried. I think the OP would be much better off with something more narrow. That would make it much easier to engage turns and transition from edge to edge better. I think I might even get something more narrow next season just so I can switch edges faster
boarder22ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 02:21 PM   #26 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
BigmountainVMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sugarloaf, ME / Philly
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boarder22ab View Post
As far as width is concerned, I would say 25.3cm ww is still way too wide for a size 8 boot. The board I ride has a 25.2 ww and Im riding size 11 boots. Even with my 11s i have hardly any overhang and couldnt drag my boots if I tried. I think the OP would be much better off with something more narrow. That would make it much easier to engage turns and transition from edge to edge better. I think I might even get something more narrow next season just so I can switch edges faster
I totally agree. After really looking at my Proto with a 25.3 cm waist and size 11 boots... he should have something in the 24s for sure.
BigmountainVMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 08:08 PM   #27 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Wow, everybody in agreement - rarely happens on this forum
That should tell the OP something...
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums