Ride Customer Service SUCKS - Page 7 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #61 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-25-2013, 11:14 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Extremo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 3,571
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by trapper View Post
Thanks for this thread, I will never buy a Ride product as a result of it.
Seriously, Ride makes some banger products, but this is discouraging. I may never buy Ride again as well. Too many good companies out there taking care of their customers to tolerate this shit.

Kudos to the companies that go the extra mile.
Extremo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-25-2013, 12:36 PM
Veteran Member
 
scotty100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
I'd rather judge a company on NOT having to use customer service at all. Too many comments on how great "company x went the extra mile the five times I had to contact them to get spare parts because their bindings fall apart every 2 weeks..." Give me products that work as intended so you never have to hear from me again and you'll keep my business is how I look at it.
scotty100 is offline  
post #63 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-25-2013, 12:57 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
crash77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty100 View Post
I'd rather judge a company on NOT having to use customer service at all. Too many comments on how great "company x went the extra mile the five times I had to contact them to get spare parts because their bindings fall apart every 2 weeks..." Give me products that work as intended so you never have to hear from me again and you'll keep my business is how I look at it.
But not every and I'm willing to bet most products aren't purchased directly from the manufacturer. As a retailer, if you choose to carry a product, you should stand behind it.
crash77 is offline  
post #64 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 10:36 AM
Veteran Member
 
East告de's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty100 View Post
I'd rather judge a company on NOT having to use customer service at all. Too many comments on how great "company x went the extra mile the five times I had to contact them to get spare parts because their bindings fall apart every 2 weeks..." Give me products that work as intended so you never have to hear from me again and you'll keep my business is how I look at it.
you must really realllllly baby your gear. shit happens, why is why these products are offered with a warranty to begin with. and do you know BEFORE you buy something that it isn't going to break? You must really throw a fit when you need to take a car in for service. lol..what a stupid fucking post.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Never Summer Evo 153/Restricted ReFlex Cartel
Gnu Danny Kass 156 BTX
East告de is offline  
post #65 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by East告de View Post
you must really realllllly baby your gear. shit happens, why is why these products are offered with a warranty to begin with. and do you know BEFORE you buy something that it isn't going to break? You must really throw a fit when you need to take a car in for service. lol..what a stupid fucking post.
yeah, considering a six sigma designation (pretty much the highest mark you can get that basically says your company has all its shit together) still allows room for manufacturing defects (3.4 per million, or .00034%). and since snowboard manufacturers typically don't have the wherewithal to get to this designation, i'm willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that their defect rates are significantly higher.

mmmmmm, doughnuts.
onefutui2e is offline  
post #66 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 10:58 AM
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 6,805
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefutui2e View Post
mmmmmm, doughnuts.
Sittin in your squad car behind Arby's doin a little SBForums?


fwiw: I had a buckle on my Contrabands break during a very good season 2 years ago and I had a bag of free parts in a week. Unfortunately it took me months of run-around to get service from the same company, K2.

Imo metal baseplates are just not comfy by comparison. I'll probably buy another K2 binding because I like them.

Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline  
post #67 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 02:22 PM
Veteran Member
 
scotty100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by East告de View Post
you must really realllllly baby your gear. shit happens, why is why these products are offered with a warranty to begin with. and do you know BEFORE you buy something that it isn't going to break? You must really throw a fit when you need to take a car in for service. lol..what a stupid fucking post.
I don't "baby" anything. But what I expect is a product that is often north of 250 bucks not to break down due to inferior materials or design < 30 days of use on the hill. I don't expect to have to chase a company's customer service for something that should not happen in the first place. Bit like you presumably don't expect to chase Never Summer on quality issues because their 3 year warranty is a statement of superior build. Rome's customer service gets lauded big time on here and props to them for having a great team but perhaps if they designed or improved the materials of their bindings a little better they wouldn't have to put so much effort into keeping annoyed customers happy.
scotty100 is offline  
post #68 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 02:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty100 View Post
I don't "baby" anything. But what I expect is a product that is often north of 250 bucks not to break down due to inferior materials or design < 30 days of use on the hill. I don't expect to have to chase a company's customer service for something that should not happen in the first place. Bit like you presumably don't expect to chase Never Summer on quality issues because their 3 year warranty is a statement of superior build. Rome's customer service gets lauded big time on here and props to them for having a great team but perhaps if they designed or improved the materials of their bindings a little better they wouldn't have to put so much effort into keeping annoyed customers happy.
I'm not sure of your business acumen but it's always a cost/benefit thing (Google Ford Pinto memo if you're curious; its truthfulness is suspect but it's the most blatant example of what I'm trying to get at). In Rome's case, it's probably the case that it's cheaper for them to deal with customer complaints and send replacement parts than it is to invest in processes to ensure it doesn't happen in the first place, at least in the near-term.

Of course, this is purely an economic scenario. You can argue that if they just build superior products, then they'll have stronger legs to stand on and attract more customers so that investment might actually be worth it. But I'm not well-versed in their board room meetings enough to know what went into this decision, or if there was ever any discussion at all.

TL;DR - Investing in manufacturing processes to eliminate defects is not always cheaper than just dealing with the defects as they come.
onefutui2e is offline  
post #69 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 02:36 PM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A warranty may or may not be a sign of a well made product. Maybe just a marketing strategy for a bad product, with a willingness to deal with problems later after sale is made. I don't think it is possible to generalize.
scottb7 is offline  
post #70 of 94 (permalink) Old 02-26-2013, 02:43 PM
Veteran Member
 
scotty100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 69 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefutui2e View Post
I'm not sure of your business acumen but it's always a cost/benefit thing (Google Ford Pinto memo if you're curious; its truthfulness is suspect but it's the most blatant example of what I'm trying to get at). In Rome's case, it's probably the case that it's cheaper for them to deal with customer complaints and send replacement parts than it is to invest in processes to ensure it doesn't happen in the first place, at least in the near-term.

Of course, this is purely an economic scenario. You can argue that if they just build superior products, then they'll have stronger legs to stand on and attract more customers so that investment might actually be worth it. But I'm not well-versed in their board room meetings enough to know what went into this decision, or if there was ever any discussion at all.

TL;DR - Investing in manufacturing processes to eliminate defects is not always cheaper than just dealing with the defects as they come.
I am fairly well-versed in the trade-offs some companies make to ensure profit margins are sustained in manufacturing. But there comes a tipping point where inferior design / materials becomes a risk to overall brand value if/when enough customers perceive quality of a product to be inferior due to continually having to contact customer service due to early breakdown of parts etc. Especially if the cost of the product to begin with warrants a higher level of quality in the eyes of the consumer. That applies not only to Rome, but all companies.
scotty100 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome