![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 799
|
I was reading DreamPow's post about his 2013 Cartels and it appears I have a similar issue with mine. I bought & mounted these on my 2010/11 Arbor Roundhouse 163W exactly as I did my Old 2010/11 Cartels. (I have 2010 10.5 32 ST Boa boots)
These New Cartels cannot be centered on my Arbor. When I mount them In the most toe forward position possible, I have about a 1/2 inch of overhang on my toe & as much as an inch- inch & half of heel overhang! The board is unridable like this!!! Now I demo'd these bindings back in Dec. and I was told the ones I tried were large bindings! (...the Demo'd pair were that ugly blue/teal color, Mine are the asphalt!) I rode those Demo Cartels on a few Burton boards and I liked the bindings so much I asked if I could try them on my Arbor! I loved them on my board!!! They were Super comfortable & I didn't notice any ride or performance problems with them on my Arbor board. So I don't know why the ones I just purchased are like this! Defective maybe????? I can't use them like this, and I don't believe that going to a Med size will solve the problem like it did for DreamPow! I've had Med bindings on this Wide Arbor before & didn't like the way they rode! (...Too small for a wide board like this!) Any suggestions? Is this something that others are experiencing? Should I contact Burton or just return them to REI & try another pair? Appreciate your time & help!
__________________
You're only Young Once,.. but you can be Immature FOREVER!!!! ![]() 2012/13 Season; (48) days out! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 3,112
|
I think this is common with unibody bindings. Probably why they created the EST system. The reason I got rid of my Cartels was because I couldn't center the boots without the discs turned sideways, which obviously limits stance options to what ever the inserts fall at. I had the same problem with my Flux.
Now it appears that the smaller re:flex disc limits the adjustment range even more so. I'm not sure why they don't spend more time on their disc design. Even ride includes multiple offset discs to rectify this issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
diskphoto.JPG disk2photo.JPG Here's all the heel overhang that position gives me: 3photo.JPG Heelphoto.JPG Almost no toe overhang: toe2photo.JPG photo.JPG sorry about upside down pics,.. I edited them but iPhone apparently embeds the orientation regardless!!!
__________________
You're only Young Once,.. but you can be Immature FOREVER!!!! ![]() 2012/13 Season; (48) days out! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 799
|
Now that CAN'T be right can it? My 2010/11 Cartels are a tiny bit heel heavy when centerd using the same (relative) bolt holes. This is an unridable situation for this board! It's already a bit hard to initiate toeside turns with it being a wide board as is. But with NO toe side Leverage??? this sucks, and I don't know why the Cartel's I demo'd didn't feel this bad on this board!!
I noticed how different, bad/squirelly this setup felt the very first time I rode it, but I thought I just had to dial in my hi-backs & angles! This set up isn't ridable as it is!
__________________
You're only Young Once,.. but you can be Immature FOREVER!!!! ![]() 2012/13 Season; (48) days out! Last edited by chomps1211; 03-01-2013 at 07:58 AM. Reason: adding pertinent info! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|