Binding advice.....again ;) - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 08:41 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Binding advice.....again ;)

Hey guys. I've been lurking this Forum for several years now, and always found it to be a useful reference tool every since I stopped following new tech innovations in riding. So, I finally decided to join and be part of the discussion.

As the title says, I'm looking for input on bindings. I have a few in mind, but would appreciate any input you may have.

The Facts

Experience: 18 seasons
Location: Upstate NY, Mass, and Vermont riding (fast hardpack).
Rider: 5'11" 155lbs
Style: Aggressive freeride. Fast charging, hard carving, popping off drops, rollers, and hips. Essentially zero rails, but the occasional park jump when conditions are good. Occasional pop-180 or butter, nose / tail / method grabs. Trees when available.
Current set-up: Trilogy Arts "The Castle" 157, older Union Data bindings, Salomon F20 boots. Boots are ill-fitting and will be replaced as well.
Stance: Slight duck, good bit of forward lean. Considering going back to a 100% directional stance because I almost never ride switch.
*The new board I'm looking at bindings for: * Smokin' Superpark 156 (camber). This is a "freestyle" board, but is said to be snappy and medium stiff. Weight range for this size is 150-200. Seeing as though I'm only 155, it should make the board on the stiffer / snappy end for me, which I love.


The Contenders:

-Raiden Phantom (highback stiff enough?)
-Raiden Blackhawk
-K2 The Company
-K2 Formula (too soft?)
-Rome Arsenal (low end?)
-Rome Targa


*I've never ridden a canted binding before, so it's of interest. Beneficial ? Not sure.

*Flows are always on my mind, but unsure of them.

*I'm not really a Burton fan, so please don't go there. It's only because I find their bindings too wide for the narrow boots I use and will use.


That's my essay; thanks for entertaining it.

Last edited by TheBigChill; 08-29-2013 at 11:47 AM.
TheBigChill is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 11:47 AM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
If you think you'll be riding a directional stance why are you looking at a twin board?

Bindings that will fit your style best are the Company and Blackhawks from that list. I'd add Flow NX2 AT's or Fuse RS's and Flux SF's.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 12:19 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I already bought that board. The reason that I bought it is this: It was a great deal for a high-end magne traction board, and the flex seemed aggressive enough for me.

I rode a directional stance for 15 seasons or so, then tried "duck". There are occasions when I ride switch, it's just rare.
TheBigChill is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 01:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Flux DMs or SF45s
jml22 is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 01:58 PM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
If you think you'll be riding a directional stance why are you looking at a twin board?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigChill View Post
I already bought that board. The reason that I bought it is this: It was a great deal for a high-end magne traction board, and the flex seemed aggressive enough for me. There are occasions when I ride switch, it's just rare.
Sounds like you bought the wrong board. I know in most posts we say the boards aren't that big of a deal, but if you almost never ride switch, why get a twin board?
poutanen is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 02:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by poutanen View Post
Sounds like you bought the wrong board. I know in most posts we say the boards aren't that big of a deal, but if you almost never ride switch, why get a twin board?
Probably got it from the Smokin factory sale. 200 bucks for a good board is pretty sexy.
miplatt88 is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 02:45 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I appreciate the concern you all have about the board being a twin, however, I've been riding 30+ days per season for 18 years. I'll be fine on this twin; the flex is right, the weight range is right, the waist width is right. I wanted to try Magne on a non-Mervin board, and got a great deal on the Smokin', as mentioned. The board I'm replacing, the Trilogy Arts one, is also a true twin and has been nothing less than a joy to ride.

I don't mean to sound pompous, rather, I'm just confident that this board will work fine, and I came for advice on new binding tech and matching them to the Smokin'. I haven't stayed up on the tech, and bought my Union Datas several years ago; they're now a bit beat-up. Thanks

I'm not super interested in Flux bindings. Maybe it's worth another look, but last time I tried a pair they were overly wide and too plush for good response.

Last edited by TheBigChill; 08-29-2013 at 02:47 PM.
TheBigChill is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What model did you have?
jml22 is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 03:11 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What model of which ? Board, or bindings ?

My old (current) set-up is a Trilogy Arts "The Castle" 157cm with Union Data bindings (the originals).
TheBigChill is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-29-2013, 03:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
No what model flux bindings did you try.
jml22 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome