![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm going to buy a Burton Custom but I can't decide if I should go for the 154 or 156...
First off, I'm a beginner. I'm already pretty good at linking (skidded) turns and most basic stuff. The only basic technique I'm learning now is cross-over and cross-under carving. I'm 6' (180 cm) tall and weigh around 140-145 (63-65 kg) pounds and I'm 24 yo so I won't grow anymore. I am eating a lot but it doesn't stick to my body so I guess I won't really get any heavier during the next coming years. Oh yeah, my feet are about 10-11. I will mostly be riding on the slopes in the France Alps as I'm from Belgium and occasionally also indoor slopes. Eventually I would also like to learn some ground tricks like buttering, small jumps, ... but not really park stuff. Would you recommend the 154 or the 156? Thx! |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a 154 custom and I am about the same weight but a few inches shorter. you're a total pencil dude. I would say go with the 156 just because at your height it will seem more proportional to your body. Plus, if you're mostly freeriding with it there's no need to try to ride something that's too small. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is the 154 really too small in your opinion?
Some people told me it will turn more easily and feel more responsive/alive and that the 156 will only be more useful for powder. Learning ground tricks would also be easier with the 154 according to them? |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 3,112
|
At that weight you're fine with the 154 and you wont notice any difference at high speeds but the only thing i'd be worried about is if a size 11 will fit on the 154's waist. You obv dont have boots yet or you'd know your size. Get boots first before you buy a board that's much to narrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You're right.
I actually looked up the ww for both the 154 and the 156 and they are 246 and 247 mm, so only 1 mm diff. Tomorrow I'm going to the shop to try out some boots, especially the ones that claim to have a smaller footprint like the Burton Ruler and try everything out on the board. The setup I'm planning to buy is custom ics + cartel est + ruler boots probably. I'm riding 18/-12, and it seems like the cartel est bindings go a little bit up on the toe side, which should help reduce toe drag, I hope. Anyway, I'm not buying anything before I actually tried it out as a complete setup ![]() After all, we're speaking a decent amount of money here. Thx for the advice! |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Allright dudes,
I went to the shop last night and tried some things out. Finally I went with the Custom 154, medium Cartel EST bindings and size 10.5 Ruler boots (reduced footprint). The bindings are set up at +17/-15 and the overhang looks really ok! The overhang is less than 1 inch, around 0.80 inch, which should be good since the cartel bindings go up on the toe side, further reducing toe drag. Anyway, this weekend I'm going to try it out on the indoor slopes
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|