Sims enduro vs k2 fatbob - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2014, 09:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Default Sims enduro vs k2 fatbob

urgent please help me out

Have 2 choices of either a k2 fatbob (155) with bindings for $110

or a sims Enduro (158) with burton freestyle bindings for $150

both boards are in excellent condition and 0 scratches/damage. k2 guy doenst know anything about boards thats why the price is low.

I like the sims better but I have a size 11 - 11.5 boot so should I just go with the wider fatbob?

Deadline to get both boards is tomorrow so I'm hoping someone can help me out, i tried to research it as best as I could.

stats: 5'10 163 (i bodybuild so my weight is usually always on the rise)

Experience level: beginner but i was riding blue trails on my first day (only day so far) seem to have picked up the basic techniques very quickly
usmcshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-02-2014, 09:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

Fatbob......
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 09:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk0ot View Post
Fatbob......
I know nothing about snowboarding, can you elaborate?

I've heard wide for the shoe size but the dude who has the enduro says it comfortably fits his 12.5's without drag. He also said its great for riding switch which i do a lot, howveer upon seeing prices the fatbob is the more expensive of the two so i'm stumped.

My boot size is 11
usmcshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 09:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

I suppose you'll be OK with either. 11 doesn't require anything special. Both are directional twins. Which are OK at switch riding. A true twin would be better. I had 2 fat bobs years ago. That's why I voted fatbob
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk0ot View Post
I suppose you'll be OK with either. 11 doesn't require anything special. Both are directional twins. Which are OK at switch riding. A true twin would be better. I had 2 fat bobs years ago. That's why I voted fatbob
They ride nice?

Like I said I don't know much i just really want to end up with a solid board that i'll love to ride as my first board

Also what do you think of the size difference? k2 is 155 sims 158
usmcshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

58 might be on the larger side. What's the fatbob look like is it an older one or newer? Photo?

The fatbob will probably be a stiffer board. Poppy, heard to turn while going slow.
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk0ot View Post
58 might be on the larger side. What's the fatbob look like is it an older one or newer? Photo?

The fatbob will probably be a stiffer board. Poppy, heard to turn while going slow.
Burton k2 Snow board with Bindings and Boots

fatbob far right

vs

Sims Snowboard 158 w/ Burton Freestyle Bindings

edit: Believe there was a miscommunication i think the fatbob is 64 inches which is 162 cm...ouch, too big if this is the case right?

Last edited by usmcshred; 01-02-2014 at 10:20 PM.
usmcshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
zk0ot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WIS
Posts: 865
Default

Ya. Pretty big. Go for the sims. Ps. That was one of the last couple years they made it
__________________
BUCK FURTON
zk0ot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zk0ot View Post
Ya. Pretty big. Go for the sims. Ps. That was one of the last couple years they made it
will 158 be too large though? I'd rather hold off to get the right size
usmcshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 10:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 152
Default

That would be too big imo. Maybe nice for a powder day. Sims is still a little big at 158. I run about 160lbs and 156 is about where I feel most comfortable on. 158 wouldn't be too much of a stretch, especially if your gaining.
sclogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums