Rossignol Templar 155 CM or 158 CM? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2014, 06:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Default Rossignol Templar 155 CM or 158 CM?

Should I order a size 155 CM or 158 CM? I'm 160 pounds, 5,11"-6,0" tall, with size 9 feet. I'm an intermediate rider, I do 80% mountain free ride and 20% park (only jumps). All of my previous boards have been 156 CM but the 156 cm on this board is a mid-wide which is not good for me as I have size 9 feet. I'm leaning towards 155 CM since I think it'd be easier to maneuver but on the Rossignol size chart it says the weight range for the 155 CM is 115-165 pounds. Is it bad that I'm only 5 pounds less than the Max weight range? The weight range for the 158 CM is 120-175 pounds. Thanks.

Last edited by bigstick; 02-06-2014 at 01:21 AM.
bigstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-05-2014, 08:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26
Default

this is probably not helpful at all as I'm a beginner and still waiting for the board to arrive, but I ordered the Templar in 155. I'm about the same weight/boot size as you, but shorter (5'7"). I went with the shorter end of what the sizing chart says because of my lack of experience (i'm told slightly shorter boards easier to learn on)

i'll just add, how is this board so cheap now? I looked now and its going for $140 on EVO!
lambar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 09:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 45
Default

I'm shorter but heavier. I went with the 158 and have a size 9 boot. I'm newer at boarding and not having any trouble with this as my first board. The longer board will have more edge which is more stable. 2 days on the board in icey conditions and was having a blast.
PorkCereal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 05:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PorkCereal View Post
I'm shorter but heavier. I went with the 158 and have a size 9 boot. I'm newer at boarding and not having any trouble with this as my first board. The longer board will have more edge which is more stable. 2 days on the board in icey conditions and was having a blast.
Just out of curiosity how much do you weigh and how tall are you?
bigstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 06:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 139
Default

go with the 158.

Ideally you should be right in the middle of the weight range. Manufacturers often exaggerate the weight range of their boards to sell to more people, so the 155 would probably not be great in terms of edge hold or float in powder.

I have the 153 and i'm in the middle of the weight range, it's a little longer than i thought I would need but i have no problems in the park. (Then again i can't even do a 540...)
ThisIsSnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 07:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
Just out of curiosity how much do you weigh and how tall are you?
I'm 5,7 175. My brother is like 5,9 160 and rode my board. He said it turned better than his rental 155 camber board.
PorkCereal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 07:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 209
Default

I'm 6'3 and 185 looking at this board. Is 158cm too small?
blackbeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 09:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks guys, I decided to go with the 158, hopefully that won't be too long. Can't believe it's only $140 on evo right now!
bigstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2014, 01:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
jtg
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 441
Default

Go slightly longer on this board. I think it might be because it's camrock, so the contact points are pulled in and some of the length you see is scooped up (longer nose/tail past the effective edge), but I'm just guessing on that being the reason.

It's pretty amazing how the price on those keeps dropping and evo still has a ton of stock. They must have made a TON of these.

Last edited by jtg; 02-06-2014 at 01:35 AM.
jtg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2014, 02:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Looks like they just raised the price $10 to $150 haha
bigstick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums