Completely new setup - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:08 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Completely new setup

Okay ,

This is my first completely new setup , it's my 2nd year of snowboarding and last year i've been riding a 1brand set from Trans Snowboards. ( Some russian brand o_O )
I mostly ride the indoor funpark in the summer but I plan on going on a trip in wich I will do some off-piste etc too next year.

This is what I had in mind :

Bataleon evil twin 155.
Ride Alpha Movement.
32 prospect boots.

Can anyone confirm that these would fit together without any problems ?
Any other feedback about these products would be highly appreciated, i'm still not sure about the setup ( there's so much to choose from )!

Thx alot !
poenanie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:10 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
legallyillegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the board and bindings outclass the boots

last year's alphas have the shitty ratchets

THERE ARE SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY I AM MORE LOCAL THAN YOU


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
legallyillegal is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:11 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by legallyillegal View Post
the board and bindings outclass the boots
Hmm , I heard a lot of great things about 32 + these are really nice priced. What else would you suggest , and could you give some more feedback on why exactly they outclass the boots ?

Thx for the ( incredibly fast ) reply

Oh and i'm talking about the 09 alpha's , are those ratchets any better ? I'm not aware of last years products since I wasn't really that into snowboarding yet back then !

Last edited by poenanie; 01-31-2009 at 10:17 AM.
poenanie is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:18 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
legallyillegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the board is awesome
the bindings can be great (although i believe betas are the better value), however some people don't like the metal baseplate

the boots are pretty soft to begin with and 32 is known for breaking down quickly

THERE ARE SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY I AM MORE LOCAL THAN YOU


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
legallyillegal is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:22 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by legallyillegal View Post
the board is awesome
the bindings can be great (although i believe betas are the better value), however some people don't like the metal baseplate

the boots are pretty soft to begin with and 32 is known for breaking down quickly

The board indeed appears to be great from what i've heard. ( though the only thing that still has me doubting is the triple base tech wich sounds great but I don't know how that would react on rails / boxes ).

The bindings are also quite cheap where I would buy them and the beta's ( at only 25$ cheaper ) are only availlable in a fugly color there so I figured to go with the alpha's expecting them to be near the same.

What other brands of boots would you recommend to go with this kind of setup then ? I can still wait to buy new boots anyway so those are the less urgent decision to make at this point ^^
poenanie is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:31 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
legallyillegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd recommend you try on different boots to see what fits.

Most companies use a 1-10 scale for stiffness, try to get something like a 6 or 7.

THERE ARE SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY I AM MORE LOCAL THAN YOU


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
legallyillegal is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:34 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by legallyillegal View Post
I'd recommend you try on different boots to see what fits.

Most companies use a 1-10 scale for stiffness, try to get something like a 6 or 7.
So something like the Tm Two from 32 would more fit my needs if I get this right ?
I noticed the prospect has a 4-rating for stiffness. I thought it was adviced to wear a more flexible boot when freestyling , or not ?
poenanie is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:39 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
legallyillegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the rating scales (much like game review scales) are all screwed up now

basically

1,2,3 = mushy (i.e. Lamar boots, Burton Freestyle, Ride Orion)
4,5 = soft (i.e. 32 Prion, Vans Encore)
6,7 = mid-flex (i.e. Burton Ion, K2 T1)
8,9 = stiff (i.e. Vans Contra)
10 = hard boots/super stiff "soft" boots (i.e. Burton Driver X)

Add in the fact that different companies have different ideas of what a mid-flex should be, etc.

A soft boot will help when tweaking, yes, but really you should be able to move around in a mid-flex. Soft boots are easily crushed by straps, and provide minimal support (hello ankle injuries).

THERE ARE SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY I AM MORE LOCAL THAN YOU


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by legallyillegal; 01-31-2009 at 10:46 AM.
legallyillegal is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:46 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by legallyillegal View Post
the rating scales (much like game review scales) are all screwed up now

basically

4,5 = soft
6,7 = mid-flex
8,9 = stiff
10 = hard boots

Add in the fact that different companies have different ideas of what a mid-flex should be, etc.

A soft boot will help when tweaking, yes, but really you should be able to move around in a mid-flex. Soft boots are easily crushed by straps, and provide minimal support (hello ankle injuries).
Well ok , mid-flex it is then , ankly injuries are the one thing I want to avoid. I had my anklemuscles completely ripped of a few years ago when skateboarding , it's the reason I started snowboading .. because my ankles feel safer !

Anyway , looking further into boots i'd narrow it down to these then :

DC Balance
Celsius Cirrus
32 Tm Two

Would all of those be a good choice or would the board and bindings still outclass them ?
poenanie is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 01-31-2009, 10:48 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
legallyillegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuck Snowboarding
Posts: 4,492
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the cirrus is a great boot if you fit in them (they're pretty wide and bulky)

THERE ARE SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY I AM MORE LOCAL THAN YOU


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
legallyillegal is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome