Burton Custom Flying V or Camber? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2014, 11:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Caffeine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Alberta (Canada)
Posts: 113
Default Burton Custom Flying V or Camber?

Hello all

Well I changed my mind and rather than going with Bataleon I think I will just grab a 2014 Burton custom. I have ridden a 2013 burton custom flying v this year and was wondering how the camber version feels compared to the flying v? Pro's? Cons?

Cheers.
Caffeine is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-18-2014, 08:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 9
Default

While they both share the name custom- they are fairly significant different feeling boards.

I personally hated the flying V. Way too loose and unstable for me. I prefer a board with more/all camber profile. However...there are lots of people that love the V.

I think these boards are different enough that you really need to ride them both- great thing is finding a place to demo both boards will be simple just about anywhere.
RidePC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 08:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 22
Default

While I haven't ridden a Flying V board, I just recently purchased a 2013 Custom Camber 162W, and I love it. It is very stable at speed and holds an edge pretty well. Very high quality board, IMHO. Can't go wrong if you can handle a camber. I have ridden a camber for years and never thought anything of it. I will say, however that the Custom camber has a healthy amount more camber than my last board and has a TON of pop and I love it.

-DS
dsciulli19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 01:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,473
Blog Entries: 10
Default

Flying V has easier turn initiation, and if you want to do surfy type things, e.g surfy/skatey moves on the sloped side of a trail, or buttering and spins the flying V board will sort of spin on the rockered centre more easily than the cambered version which will carve more so that spin. It's more 'fun' in concept.

On an icy day the flying V board won't have as much edge hold, and I find that on days where there is a lot of crud the flying V shape kind of bounces off the tops of bumpy stuff while the cambered shape will cut through it or ride through it better. Camber has more pop, better edge hold, is more precise, and a bit easier to catch an edge.

If it's rarely icy where you ride the flying V shape is fine, and keeping it sharp for icy days improves performance a lot.

I have both, and what I find is that on days where I misread the conditions and take the cambered board when it's soft enough for the flying V minor regrets, I have missed out on a little fun, while the days where I expect soft snow and end up with ice I really wish for camber, and may return to the car to swap boards. This is what happens here in Ontario. On a trip out west unless conditions are very unusual I'm on the flying V board most days.

if you can demo or borrow pretty much any flying V board you'll get a sense of it very quickly, and it's really best to ride it, it's a personal preference thing combined with the influence of the conditions.
Lamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2014, 10:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1
Default

My experience with the 162w flying v was mixed - Very good board to learn on (easy/forgiving turns) but found the board unstable at higher speeds (mostly riding on icier east coast hills).

I'm now looking for a board I can ride fast with good stability and am leaning towards the custom camber. I'm trying to determine if the increased stability from the camber will be enough or if I should size up to the 165w board.

My skills could be characterized as intermediate and weight is around 195 lbs so not sure if the 165w would be too difficult to maneuver or if I need that length to get to the level of stability I'm looking for...
jgburns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2014, 10:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 22
Default

@jgburns

I am your weight at 195 with a size 12 foot and the 162 is a great size; you won't be disappointed.

-DS
dsciulli19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums