wide or not wide? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 18 (permalink) Old 07-24-2014, 08:58 AM
Veteran Member
 
CassMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Whitefish MT
Posts: 2,298
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
thanks flea, and for me too trad. laces are the way. stiff-ish boot in a med binding is also how i like it, sold...hijack/
CassMT is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-12-2014, 07:14 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Final straight: K2 Subculture 161 2014 or K2 Ultra Dream 159W. 11,5 boots, 210 lbs, beginner, but I'm sure he will pick things fast, like he always did with any sport. At home we dont have powder, but most valuable time in real mountains will be generous with powder (sidetracks, sidecountry, no backcountry yet). I bet on Ultra.

And I am leaning towards starting my own quiver, want to add something more playfull to start learning ground tricks, rails and boxes. 159 Salomon The Man's Board is excellent for high speed charging and OK on powder days.
I can grab:
155 K2 Brigade 2014 (slightly used)
157 K2 WWW 2014 (slightly used)
157 K2 Hit Machine 2014 (slightly used)
156 K2 Raygun 2014 (slightly used)
155 Nitro Anton Gunnersson Pro one-off 2012 (new)
155 Nitro Markus Keller Pro one-off 2012 (new)
kosmoz is offline  
post #13 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-12-2014, 08:14 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Whether his boot has a reduced footprint or not will be the deciding factor. I have size 11.5 32s (reduced footprint) and find 255-260 is perfect. If they are reduced you could still get away with less than 255, just not ideal in my opinion. If they are not reduced at all I would look to something closer to 260+.

As far as the boards, BA has a review on just about all those boards so read up and make your own decision.
Brewtown is offline  
post #14 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-12-2014, 02:22 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 624
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewtown View Post
Whether his boot has a reduced footprint or not will be the deciding factor. I have size 11.5 32s (reduced footprint) and find 255-260 is perfect. If they are reduced you could still get away with less than 255, just not ideal in my opinion. If they are not reduced at all I would look to something closer to 260+.

As far as the boards, BA has a review on just about all those boards so read up and make your own decision.
Same here. I wear 11.5 burton drivers. My board is just under 260 and i never have any problems. Years ago i bought a wide because i was told you need one with 11.5 boots. It made edge transfer slow and laborious. I hated riding that thing. I just picked up a board that is even slightly narrower. I mounted up my bindings and stuck the boots in them. Looks like they should be fine. I would suggest to avoid wides unless they are really needed(monster feet, bulky boots, low stance angle etc.)
taco tuesday is offline  
post #15 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-12-2014, 09:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NoVA
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't go wide unless absolutely have to. Only sasquatch size people need wide boards with the reduction tech most boots have these days. I have size 12s and I not ride wide boards. Wide boards are really only neccesary for 13 or larger and maybe really skinny people with size 12s that ride shorter, narrow boards.
vajohn is offline  
post #16 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-18-2014, 02:56 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Went with 161 subculture. Put size 12 cheap Head boots without any footprint reduction technology and even they didn't overhang to much.
kosmoz is offline  
post #17 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-18-2014, 03:04 AM
Banned!
 
snowklinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 6,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 249 Post(s)
Gypsy sleds!

210 rad air tanker wide

Support Local Business
"Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart!" - Ash
snowklinger is offline  
post #18 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-18-2014, 03:11 AM
Veteran Member
 
ridinbend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bend
Posts: 3,507
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 272 Post(s)
ridinbend is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome