![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So Cal - Bear Mountain
Posts: 484
|
they say it does...
I've seen some pretty gnarly lookin carves utilizing that reverse camber so I think it'd be fun even on the mountain But personally I'd get the Artifact because everyone here has the banana and its pretty damn played out. (not a great reason lol, but its something that would bother me personally) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
here's the thing. i'm looking primarily for a park board, but i want something that can also handle a speed run down the mountain without too much chatter, or edges slipping out.
i'm not sure if the 1985 artifact has bronze edges like the regular one, but i heard they just don't hold very well when you're going fast. i dunno. maybe i'm looking at the wrong type of board, but if i go with something like a forum destroyer or a burton custom, i'm afraid it just won't be as soft and buttery as i want it. |
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SLC
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
i posted some pics in the 'post a pic of you ridding' thread (or whatever it's called). i have dropped 15's and close to 20-footers on the a skate 56, and i am 6'1. i'd rather ride the trs 59, however it has a shit-ass tnt base... the lib skate is a fun board, very playful and dare i say 'skate-like'. i have not ridden any rome decks, so i am not sure how they are-i hear good things, though. i would also like to add the deepest i have ridden the 56 skate, at my height, has been about three feet, anything deeper i go with a 59 directional twin, non-cambered (seems to float a hell of a lot more than the 56 at this point). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|