158 or 161 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-07-2009, 05:27 PM
I3urtonfeind
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
158 or 161

Im 6'0 240 pounds. how much of a difference am I going to find between a 158 and a 161. Im all mountain with minimal park.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-07-2009, 05:29 PM
I3urtonfeind
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
basically came across a hella good deal on a 158, but I really havent ben on anything smaller than a 160
post #3 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-07-2009, 07:40 PM
Veteran Member
 
m_jel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pickering
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
if its that good of a deal and your saving that much money, is worrying about losing only 2 cm worth it?

redbubble.com/people/mkelly06
snowyunicornlove.blogspot.com
m_jel is offline  
post #4 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-07-2009, 08:54 PM
I3urtonfeind
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
i said the same thing.. I ended up buying it, and If its not what I expected then I turn around and pass the deal onto someone else, and in worst case scenario I might actually like it. bottom line its a gamble Im willing to take.
post #5 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-08-2009, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
its just snowboarding. buy it and go for it. if you like to ride extremely fast and aggressively in challenging terrain you would probably like the 161 more. hard to say though, if the 58 is a twin and the 161 is directional the extra nose kick length might be 2 of the 3 cm's that seperate the lengths and the actual amount of board on the snow might be similar.
Incogneato is offline  
post #6 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-08-2009, 02:26 PM
Jon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Cutting down on the length of your board to save money wasn't the greatest decision. However, if the board rides comfortably on the slopes, then you made the right decision. It sounds like you got a great deal either way. I hope it works out for you!
post #7 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-09-2009, 12:35 AM
Veteran Member
 
m_jel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pickering
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon View Post
Cutting down on the length of your board to save money wasn't the greatest decision. However, if the board rides comfortably on the slopes, then you made the right decision. It sounds like you got a great deal either way. I hope it works out for you!
whats so wrong with his decision bud?

redbubble.com/people/mkelly06
snowyunicornlove.blogspot.com
m_jel is offline  
post #8 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-09-2009, 02:14 AM
Veteran Member
 
arsenic0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 2,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Other than the fact that people 180ish ride 158's freeride? Not much He's a big boy, a 158 would be more of a park board i would think for someone his size...probably get more stability at something like a 165..but if its comfortable and he likes it who cares

You need to remember that you arent losing just 2cm of length...
Waist widths go up with size for a particular board, so your losing a lot more board realistically if you add the lost width along the entire length of the board...which could be a problem if you have big feet.

'09 151 Never Summer SL-R
'10 K2 T1 DB Bots
'09 Burton Cartel Bindings
arsenic0 is offline  
post #9 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-09-2009, 04:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Reede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
im 185 and ride a 158 and it's barely passable in powder for me.

it will probably be fine on groomers but you will sink link a stone in powder unless you like riding at warp speed.
Reede is offline  
post #10 of 11 (permalink) Old 06-09-2009, 01:04 PM
Veteran Member
 
arsenic0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 2,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yup what Reede noted as well, if you truely have no interest in park or very minimal interest you should give a longer 165ish board a try some day. You'll probably find that you have a lot more stability at speed and power in your carves and can go faster...
At 6'0 240 you gotta have some massive feet, i assume your getting a 158 wide?

'09 151 Never Summer SL-R
'10 K2 T1 DB Bots
'09 Burton Cartel Bindings
arsenic0 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome