![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
|
I was taking a look at their technology called camrocker and it seems like it's the opposite of the gullwing designs that Nitro, burton, and Never summer use. It has camber between the feet and rockers at the tip and tail. I saw hoon had a review of it and he seemed to get Yes's tech confused with burton's flying v, which it is nothing like.
Anyhow, if anyone here has ridden it, how does it ride? I'm curious since it seems a step in a different direction of everyone else. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 18
|
sounds a lot like rossignol's amptec... its on my rossignol angus but cant give you any advice since there's not enough snow here yet (in iceland !!!) but i'm driving to the other side of the country to get some snow next weekend
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,954
|
That camrock looks like some crazy shit... I really want to ride one to see how it feels though.
Looks like it would be incredibly loose feeling and pretty much impossible to catch an edge... We're going to be seeing some crazy shapes in our snowboards in the near future. I think that's going to be a major factor to companies trying to sell more and more boards each year. Keep the designs interesting to people and keep em rolling off the shelves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: slc utah
Posts: 928
|
w/o reading hoons review on the Yes board ill at least defend him and say he knows his shit so whatever comps he makes are probably legit. also I do remember him talking about testing the flyv and the yes at pretty much the same time so his writing may just be a comparison of the two not necessarily saying they are similar though. I picked up a Yes at Milosport just to look at it and it felt like a load of bricks. im not sure if its really a heavy board or if my sierrascope is just really light
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: slc utah
Posts: 928
|
I agree with this .... but it also kinda sucks in that you used to pretty much be able to pick a company you were stoked on a grab a board from their selection that fit your style. now though its like ok ive never had a signal board but i think they are a pretty cool company and id like to try them but what if im not into their version of alternate camber ... makes it alot more risky to go out on a limb and buy something imo... oh well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|