![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 101
|
I'm debating between the Evo-R 153 or the SL-R 155, and right now I'm leaning towards the Evo because I like a centered stance over directional. But I'm not sure if you can center the stance on the SL-R. I'm 5'7" 170 lbs, pretty novice rider, which is one reason I like the centered, because it puts me less in the backseat because I tend to lean back as a newbie anyways.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
|
That's the wrong reason to center a stance. Fix yourself, not your board. Don't get into bad habits early and you won't have to break them later.
__________________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." 10/11 - 24, Smote on Feb 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 101
|
So maybe I'm just retarded and am not getting this. Basically what I don't get is whether or not the SL-R is a twin or not. SO basically, the Evo is the same tail and nose length, so you have a centered stance. But then the pop is also twin on the Evo? But not on the SL-R. I guess I don't get the difference between twin and directional, and how it applies to these two boards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Samyaksambuddhas
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Only British blaady Columbia!!!
Posts: 4,622
|
is this a thread aboot cars by mitsubishi or conventional fotography?
jeez.... my summer has been waaaaay too long!
__________________
Just coz you don't understand it Doesn't mean it makes no sense! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|