![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 53
|
Alright, narrowed down.
All 3 are on sale. I am an all mountain rider, and I am DEFINATELY moving my focus on the park. I own a K2 Illusion that I will keep but it will be a backup. What are the pro's and cons? Also, Rocker vs. the regular WWW, what kind of a difference would I notice? I know they are all extremely well reviewed boards, so thanks for the help. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 166
|
Parkstar is for you. It is park board which is better for jumps in park and can handle allmountain/jibs too.
WWW is just for park, focused on jibs and small jumps. Difference between regular cambered WWW and rockered WWW u will feel on pop and how easy u can catch your edge. Camber has more pop , but u can catch your edge easily. Rocker is more playfull, easy to press but lacks in pop a little bit compared to camber and ofcourse u wont get that 'pop' in turns with rocker. But then again it up to you what u like
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 53
|
Ya, I was definately leaning more towards the Parkstar.
I am looking at getting a 157 wide parkstar, I weigh 160 lbs. My current board is a 163, but that was a gift, and it was sized based on my height. (I understand height is much less of an issue than weight, but if it matters I am 6'3") Is that too much of a downsize, to go from a 163 to a 157? will it make it unstable? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,610
|
I'd agree with the parkstar. However, IMO, I'd go smaller than a 157. I have 10lbs on you and I ride a 152 Darkstar. Granted the parkstar may be a little more flexy, but I don't believe it's that much more. BTW, what is your boot size?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
And really? Do you have any problems riding a 152? That's 9cm shorter than I'm used to, I never would have thought to go that small |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 166
|
I weight same as u and i use my 151 evo-r everywhere. Ofc i dont charge steeps like with freeride board bud its still doable and if u want just butter around the mountain u can go with 152 without problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,610
|
Yeah, you'll need a wide with a 14 boot. And yes, really. I take my board from park to peak without any issues. Granted, I've never taken this board into pow country, but I don't get a lot of that out in the east coast.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|