Help w/NS Legacy Sizing - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2011, 05:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Default Help w/NS Legacy Sizing

This is my first post and I know there are plenty of sizing threads out there. I've been riding for about 10 years and currently have the '05 NS Legacy. I'm looking into upgrading and getting the new NS Legacy but can't decide between the 163 and 166.

I am 6'1", 205 lbs and wear a size 12 boot. I would categorize myself as a freerider (too old and big for park) but want something a bit softer (I believe the new ones are softer) and a bit more playful for ollies, ground tricks and small jumps. I can straight line blues, ride black diamonds no problem and don't mind the double blacks on good day. I ride in Lake Tahoe.

I did notice that the waist width (26.9cm) and effective edge (130cm) are the same on both. It appears the only differences would be the dimensions of the tip/tail. With all that said what would be the different riding characteristics between the two?

Also if anyone has the '05 or old model and the new, could you shed some light on the differences you have noticed? Is it lighter, softer, is it better/worse at straightlining? Mine is pretty heavy and I wouldn't mind a lighter board. Should a 161 be considered?

Thanks.

Last edited by gmoney009; 01-11-2011 at 05:32 PM.
gmoney009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-11-2011, 06:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: DE
Posts: 103
Default

I compared the 161 and 163 side by side, one on top of the other in a store. Probably spent 20 minutes looking at both and trying to decide between the two. I eventually went with the 163 but I haven't had the opportunity to ride it yet. The extra waist width was barely noticeable, just the length. The 161 just felt small to me.

Previously I had a traditional cambered board, size 163 - Its waist width and effective edge specs were very close to the Legacy's 161. I believe with the hybrid R/C design, you can go a little shorter because the board will flatten out when your on it. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm also about your size. 6'3"-6'4", 215 with a size 12 boot.

Jon
LightninSVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 06:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
MunkySpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 3,212
Default

My '10 Legacy 163 is real kind to me.

I'm 6'4" 205lbs, size 13 boot.

The biggest diff between the new and '05 models? Just about everything: Weight, flex, camber, sidecut.

Take that info for what it's worth.
__________________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

10/11 - 24, Smote on Feb 13
MunkySpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 11:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Default

163 just might be the ticket for me.
gmoney009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums