Board and Size Recommendations - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2011, 08:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Question Board and Size Recommendations

New to the forum and look forward to any feedback given.

I am done renting boards and looking into finally purchasing my own equipment.

I am hoping to get feedback and recommendations from other boarders.

I am 6ft, 190lbs and wear a size 12 boot. I like using the performance boards and have had used Burton boards for most of my rentals but open to any other brand suggestions.

What size board in length range and board waist width would you recommend based on my physical description mentioned above? Also when purchasing a board and bindings separately, are all bindings compatible with any board or are their specs to look for in bindings as well?

I am also interested, in regards to width, a board that does NOT result in toe over hang with my bindings.

I appreciate any help.

Thanks!
SnowSportGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-30-2011, 08:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Hodgepodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC/CT
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSportGuy View Post
New to the forum and look forward to any feedback given.

I am done renting boards and looking into finally purchasing my own equipment.

I am hoping to get feedback and recommendations from other boarders.

I am 6ft, 190lbs and wear a size 12 boot. I like using the performance boards and have had used Burton boards for most of my rentals but open to any other brand suggestions.

What size board in length range and board waist width would you recommend based on my physical description mentioned above? Also when purchasing a board and bindings separately, are all bindings compatible with any board or are their specs to look for in bindings as well?

I am also interested, in regards to width, a board that does NOT result in toe over hang with my bindings.

I appreciate any help.

Thanks!
you are going to be looking in the 161-163 range if you are an all mountain rider. definitely a wide, meaning 26cm + waist width. what kind of boards were you looking at? regular/reverse camber, etc
__________________
-HodgePodge
Hodgepodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 08:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodgepodge View Post
you are going to be looking in the 161-163 range if you are an all mountain rider. definitely a wide, meaning 26cm + waist width. what kind of boards were you looking at? regular/reverse camber, etc
Thanks for you reply!

Is it better to go with Reverse Camber if mostly doing mountain riding? I also ride goofy I believe (right foot forward), so I am not sure if that makes a difference in binding/board selection
SnowSportGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 09:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Hodgepodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC/CT
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSportGuy View Post
Thanks for you reply!

Is it better to go with Reverse Camber if mostly doing mountain riding? I also ride goofy I believe (right foot forward), so I am not sure if that makes a difference in binding/board selection
doesnt make a difference which way you ride! if you are going to be going in a lot of powder most of the time, you should look at reverse camber. also, if you are a park guy who love rails and smaller jumps, look at reverse camber. on the other hand if you like big jumps, carving corduroy, and arcing powerful turns, you should look at regular camber. if you want a slay it all deck, check out hybrid camber, like mervin's c2btx or never summers rc tech. really, it all comes down to what feels right for you.
__________________
-HodgePodge
Hodgepodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 09:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodgepodge View Post
doesnt make a difference which way you ride! if you are going to be going in a lot of powder most of the time, you should look at reverse camber. also, if you are a park guy who love rails and smaller jumps, look at reverse camber. on the other hand if you like big jumps, carving corduroy, and arcing powerful turns, you should look at regular camber. if you want a slay it all deck, check out hybrid camber, like mervin's c2btx or never summers rc tech. really, it all comes down to what feels right for you.
Thanks again for your help!

Since this is my first board and still in learning phase, a reverse camber seems right for me. My ideal conditions is to ride in powder most of the time. Just rode in Tahoe this weekend with a cambered board and it was a mix of powder and ice and it did relatively well.
SnowSportGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 09:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Now when it comes to bindings, are there some that are better than others or act differently?

Sorry for all the questions.
SnowSportGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2011, 10:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
onji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowSportGuy View Post
Now when it comes to bindings, are there some that are better than others or act differently?

Sorry for all the questions.
I'm going to try and avoid saying some bindings are better and others are worse as an overall quality. But given that, some bindings are better for some people, and others are not.

I don't know a whole lot about bindings but I'd recommend if you can't get a test run on the setup, at least see how your feet feel inside your boot, inside the binding, atop the board.

You also need to decide on whether you want ratchet bindings or the quick-release (Flow) bindings. They're both good types of binding. The quick-release are good because you can get in & out of them really quickly and (IMO) don't create pronounced pressure points on your feet. It's for these reasons my girlfriend prefers quick-release. I prefer ratchet because (IMO) I get quicker response from the board which I prefer at high speed & in the park. I also find the quick-release bindings really hard to release if you get buried in deep powder.
onji is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums