![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#211 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
The 2011 is so fun. I haven't ridden the 2012 but that will change come November
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#212 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
Riot 159 Wide will be insane for you. The Goliath 160 Wide would be unreal as a one board quiver, but you already have major freeride covered and the Riot is untouchable as a big guy all over freestyle power board. PS: take the extra cm of width and go with the wide. It will work better at any stance with size 12. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
the omni is her pow stick. gonna move her from her Smokin Vixen 148 to a TBT board for her day to day board. she hates girlyfied graphics (vanity is a biatch hahaha, form over function). was thinking either an ET 149 or a Goliath 150 for her 5'7" 130lb frame. she follows me all over the mountain, just a little more risk averse, but still likes to haul, hahaha.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,796
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#219 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,796
|
Got it. 7.5 women's = 6 men's = 24 cm = very small.
Width is a killer for small footed women and while some have gotten very good at riding wider boards, almost all really appreciate it when they get on something appropriately narrow. The waists on the 149 ET and the Goliath 150 are 24.6 cm (and both are going to be ~ 1cm wider again at her stance position). That means that her toes/heels will be ~ a combined inch inside the edges at a normal stance. That makes it impossible to ride a board to its designed potential. The Violenza 149 will be a great choice if she can live with the graphics. |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Wiredsport, great thread and some great advice, so here's my story:
I'm 5'9", 160 lbs and wearing a US size 9 Burton Hail. Currently riding a 2009 Jam 157 for piste charging (at which it excels) a couple of weeks a year when work allows and a few trips to the 100 Yds indoor snow slope just to get my fix in between. I need to add to it something slower with more flex for two reasons, firstly the Jam is a bit of a beast for 100 Yds of slope, by the time I get it half way to its potential I'm queueing for the lift, secondly on piste I need to escort my beginner wife now and then so I want something more playful to keep me amused while she perfects her turns and picks her butt off the floor, holding the Jam back is a calf muscle killer. I've got little experience at butters, presses or even ollies and don't think the Jam ideal for improving these. I was looking at K2 WWW and tried out the wifes K2 Luna for laughs when I realised how much I loved TBT, I do enjoy spinning like a loon without catching an edge. I saw the 2012 catalogue online and after reading up on all the awesome looking new TBT found I was leaning towards the new airobic. So the Jam stays, no question and I want something to add to it, don't need one board that does a bit of everything, just one a bit playful that can handle basic tricks without kicking my butt, maybe the odd rail and kicker too. So jib versus twin, airobic versus ET, disaster too soft for my weight? Your thoughts on board and size would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|