![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
|
Hello,
I have been reading a lot of the articles on this website and I have yet to be convinced either way. Here are my stats and my board, please let me know what you think. Height: 5'8" Weight: 176 lbs Boots: 10.5 (actually size 11.5 using burton's "shrinkage technology" size 10.5 footprint. Board: Never Summer Heritage Length: 155 Width: 252 Bindings: Flow size Large I have my setup at +15 -12 and I have centered and measured my overhang at roughly 1 inch front and back. Now it's hard to measure the actual overhang of the boots because they curve upwards at roughly 3/4 of an inch, and if I measure at the actual tip of of the toe and heel it's a little bit more than an inch and obviously the rear foot is a little more overhang than the front due to the less angle degrees. Is this going to be a problem or should I get the 156W version of this board which has a 260 width or possibly even a larger size? I am an intermediate rider who loves going fast on groomers and doing sharp, some what deep carves. I am getting curious about hitting jumps and cruising the park to learn something different. The powder situation is almost never a possibility. Please let me know what you think about my situation. I really appreciate your responses. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kazachstan
Posts: 255
|
Quote:
Oh. i read you like deep carves... Well, better check yourself, because your(and mine ^_^) deep carves is nothing to hardbooters. Go wide only if you can lay down really well. (you gotta change stace for it also =)) in other case keep this stick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 354
|
I got size 12s and my stiarmaster has a 252 waist. I rode it for the last 2 years and have never had any boot drag. My stance is 15/-15 so fairly similar. I don't remember if i have ever really pushed a turn on the board though.
You will probably be fine with what you ahve though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 69
|
I have a size 11 and rode anywhere from 15, -9 to 15, -15 over the years. Boards I have owned have typically been in the 248 to 250ww. this was before 'shrinkage tech' or whatever. I never had any issues. when I tried a 246ww it felt a bit narrow, and 244ww was definitely too narrow for me and I suffered from toe-grab, but as soon as I tried a 252ww or greater I found a decreased responsiveness edge-to-edge.
Now I have size 11 with shrinkage, ride a 250ww at 15,-15 and it is perfect for me. Long story short, I think you'll be just fine! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Thanks for the comparison. I'm just curious on how long your board is, your weight, and how you typically ride (freeride/park). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC/CT
Posts: 367
|
i ride with size 11 boots on a board with 255 mm waist width at ducked out angles and i have nooo trouble with overhang at all. IMO, the narrowest you should go is about a 248 or so, with normal stance width and angles. frankly, it does really all depend on your width and angles.
__________________
-HodgePodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 649
|
You will be fine. I use size 12 boots with a 254. The 1.5 footprint size difference should easily make up for the 2mm difference. At least I would think.
__________________
East Coast Park Rat 2008 Burton Twin 157 w/ Rome 390 Boss 2005 Burton Canyon 168 w/ Ride LS "its ppl like you, that I would "impact damage" your face if i ever saw you keep your mouth shut. one more time, please and thank you." -user: chingy_ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
Boards in the past have ranged between 152 and 158 depending on use, although I have rode anywhere from 139 to 165 but these extremes don't make me happy. Basically I love to spin, press, butter, rails, boxes, kickers. I ride switch at least 35% of the time. For me 155ish is the sweet spot of length/pressability and my stance width while retaining a nice reduced swing-weight. Hope this helps! Last edited by Chaos Theory; 02-07-2011 at 06:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|