![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 239
|
[QUOTE=Leo;374094]Wow... This really is one of the most gimmicky posts of all time. Let's hope no one falls for it like us blind sheep are falling for any type of Rocker.
What's wrong with rockered boards being more forgiving? If that's the philosophy you live by, then start driving a stick shift car without any power steering or anti-lock brakes. After all, that other BS is just training wheels. Matter of fact, screw the car altogether and walk to your destination. Stop being such a beginner noob driving cars and riding bikes. Real men walk. QUOTE] You forgot to exclude the use of shoes Leo
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,229
|
You forgot to put serious in quotes like I did. (o; I have had the chance to ride all the new designs at SIA's on snow demo this past year. Yes, in pow camber is faster. Rocker makes it EASIER to ride in pow, not faster. Hybrid camber (Rome anthem SS, new Capita BSOD, and the rest) is OK, with full camber and when you weight it, the tip and tail rise. The only problem with that is the contact points are flapping around when weighted and you are still riding from the center. C2, flying V, and Never Summer's version works really hard and solving it, but it is still banana no matter how you peel it. (o: Last edited by Sick-Pow; 02-11-2011 at 09:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
lost in the ugly trees
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jay Peak
Posts: 2,344
|
What I like about rocker is the versatility. I dare you to show me a cambered board that I can lap the park with, ride switch, Cruise some groomers and then still take into the trees in deep pow without it absolutely killing my back leg the way that my Never Summer can.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
I'd rebut this pile of nonsense but Leo did a perfectly fine job. Go read his post again.
__________________
I have a word limit on my cynicism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,031
|
Quote:
As far as the people complaining about rocker, reverse camber, hybrid sounds like you guys just can't ride to begin with. But different strokes for different folks ride what you like but at least have some valid points.
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,202
|
I honestly don't understand how camber is faster in pow. You don't even use edges in real powder. When I was in Tahoe with knee deep stuff, I couldn't carve like I normally do. It was more like surfing since my edges had no ground to engage on. I'm not an expert by any means, just confuses me. In my mind, if your board floats much better on pow, then you will obviously also be faster since you are staying on top of the pow.
In powder, I'm inclined to believe stiffness, base material, and float affects speed more than any other factor like sidecut or camber... Of course, I'm talking with proper technique and all else equal. Maybe you just aren't riding pow properly on your board. Actually, I can see camber being faster since most pow riders on cambered sticks setback their stance. So the longer nose and more weight on the tail makes you faster in pow. Well, you can do the exact same thing on a rocker. Just because it's rocker does not mean you can't set your stance back. No you will have the longer nose and more weight on your tail on top of tons of extra float from the rocker shape. Last edited by Leo; 02-11-2011 at 09:35 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|