Rocker, Camber, and everything in between - Page 5 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2011, 07:14 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Now I have a follow-up question...

I am looking to get a snowboard for the upcoming season because I have only ridden rentals...the rentals thave I've ridden was a 150. I'm looking at the Stepchild Latchkey and wondering should I go for a 148 or a 153?

Any info would help. Thanks!
broken is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:34 PM   #42 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broken View Post
Now I have a follow-up question...

I am looking to get a snowboard for the upcoming season because I have only ridden rentals...the rentals thave I've ridden was a 150. I'm looking at the Stepchild Latchkey and wondering should I go for a 148 or a 153?

Any info would help. Thanks!
Hi Broken,

Thanks again.

As mentioned above, you cannot determine the correct board size based on length. Without knowing the specifics of the rental boards that you used, we will need to start from scratch. What is your weight and foot size?

Last edited by Wiredsport; 04-12-2011 at 08:51 PM.
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 02:27 AM   #43 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Hi Broken,

Thanks again.

As mentioned above, you cannot determine the correct board size based on length. Without knowing the specifics of the rental boards that you used, we will need to start from scratch. What is your weight and foot size?
I am 5'7", i weight about 160, and I wear a size 9.5.
broken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 11:13 AM   #44 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broken View Post
I am 5'7", i weight about 160, and I wear a size 9.5.
Hi Broken,

In an effort to keep this thread focused on new technologies and not specific product recs, I sent you an offline message. I hope that is OK. Kindly check your PM.

Thanks!
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 02:19 AM   #45 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Great list.
I may have missed it, but how about adding S-shaped camber?
Rocker - Camber and Rocker - Flat
BoardInsiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 09:23 AM   #46 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoardInsiders View Post
Great list.
I may have missed it, but how about adding S-shaped camber?
Rocker - Camber and Rocker - Flat
So that I understand, are you asking about a Rocker-Camber-Rocker design that then has an extra flat section on either the tip, tail, or both?
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 12:55 PM   #47 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
So that I understand, are you asking about a Rocker-Camber-Rocker design that then has an extra flat section on either the tip, tail, or both?


I suppose in theory S-shaped Camber could be categorized as Rocker - Camber - Rocker, but I think there are too many differences, and should have it's own category.
For one it usually has just Rocker - Camber or Rocker - Flat, (with a standard contact point at the tail of the board - not raised). The second difference would be that the highpoint of the traditional camber is usually in the back 1/3 of the board and not in the middle. Also, most often the purpose of this shape is pow riding, as in the Burton Fish or the Rome Notch.

Thanks for the list. This is a much needed piece of info for everyone. I have been keeping one for the last 4 years and it's good to see a good one like this.
BoardInsiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 03:46 PM   #48 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoardInsiders View Post


I suppose in theory S-shaped Camber could be categorized as Rocker - Camber - Rocker, but I think there are too many differences, and should have it's own category.
For one it usually has just Rocker - Camber or Rocker - Flat, (with a standard contact point at the tail of the board - not raised). The second difference would be that the highpoint of the traditional camber is usually in the back 1/3 of the board and not in the middle. Also, most often the purpose of this shape is pow riding, as in the Burton Fish or the Rome Notch.

Thanks for the list. This is a much needed piece of info for everyone. I have been keeping one for the last 4 years and it's good to see a good one like this.
Yes, there are many additional twists and variations (and more to come I am sure).

Thanks for the pic!
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 11:26 AM   #49 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bella Napoli!
Posts: 178
Default Which of the new designs stands out the most?

It was difficult to purchase a board with only effective length and flex patterns. I truly cannot decide what I need for next year. Too many damn options and with the market hype it is hard to tell what works. So which of the hybrids carves the best and is made in the US!
-I sold my BSOD Speed tribe"STIFF like morning wood".
-Sold my 167 Arbor Roundhouse! Even stiffer and way too big.
-My old Lib Tech JL Phoenix was too loose and made me nervous. I did have to hit the edges with a file!
-My Rome MOD just does not carve that well but has the best pop without a doubt.
-I rode the NS heritage in powder and loved it. We just do not have powder at my local hill. How is it on ice, groomers and windblown?
ttchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2011, 07:20 AM   #50 (permalink)
Member
 
bobsy852's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Blackburn, UK
Posts: 48
Default

Just been looking at next seasons DC snowboards and caught this video:


At about 1:06 in he mentions a new board with "skate camber"?
I just wondered if anyone could explain this version of camber to me?
From his explination I'm under the impression that it's like traditional camber but with the ends remaining in contact with the floor instead of the very tips bending up?
If I'm right, what were the pro's and con's of this system?
bobsy852 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums