Rocker, Camber, and everything in between - Page 6 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2011, 08:10 AM   #51 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsy852 View Post
Just been looking at next seasons DC snowboards and caught this video:


At about 1:06 in he mentions a new board with "skate camber"?
He is saying that this is flat-camber-flat. We did see a few boards with that config on display this year, but when we laid them flat they actually had camber in the mid section leading into flat sections and then lifted contact points which made them really more a variety of rocker-camber-rocker. I did not check out these DC boards so they may indeed be true flat-camber-flat. Expanding the flat at the contact points could provide some extra freestyle stability out there for butters, etc, but it would come at the expense of catchy edges (as with dead flat boards). Consider that the reason for lifting the contact points in original rocker was to achieve that looser feel and reduce snagged edges.

Last edited by Wiredsport; 06-29-2011 at 08:18 PM.
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-29-2011, 03:39 PM   #52 (permalink)
Member
 
bobsy852's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Blackburn, UK
Posts: 48
Default

Thanks for that mate! I found a couple of vids on youtube as well about their new tech which helps too! Liking the sounds of this design, as it sounds like it could help for when I finally start freestyling!
bobsy852 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 08:03 AM   #53 (permalink)
Member
 
tterby1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bufunk no were
Posts: 43
Default

i warn you now alpine is a workout. im new to the stile and i like it a lot but if your not prepared its a lot of work.
tterby1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 01:34 PM   #54 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: winchester, VA
Posts: 127
Default

Wiredsport, I've been riding a long time, always camber. I like carving and charging out of turns- do you think someone like me would like a
Mervin C2 board? I've been looking at a Billy Goat.
sidewall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 05:48 AM   #55 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewall View Post
Wiredsport, I've been riding a long time, always camber. I like carving and charging out of turns- do you think someone like me would like a
Mervin C2 board? I've been looking at a Billy Goat.
C2 is incredible tech when paired with Magnetraction. You get insane bite and precision, still have a good bit of the stored energy you enjoyed with full camber and reduce the contact point snags and hard take-downs that you you would just as soon forget. The BG is a top notch Freeride deck. I am very biased, but I have also spent some ear to ear days on the BG and can suggest it to anyone who wants a no holds barred all mountain/freeride stick.
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 02:19 PM   #56 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: winchester, VA
Posts: 127
Default

Thanks for the info. I'm 6 ft tall 170, do you think the 162 is a good size?
sidewall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 02:21 PM   #57 (permalink)
Land of the Potato
 
IdahoFreshies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 1,228
Default

2cm is not going to be a deal breaker. but you are probably better around the 158-160 area. 162 is a bit much, especially for an east coast rider
__________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShredLife View Post
do they even make chaps with asses?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
I think they call them pants
IdahoFreshies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 05:50 PM   #58 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewall View Post
Thanks for the info. I'm 6 ft tall 170, do you think the 162 is a good size?
Please post up your foot size as well.

Thanks!
Wiredsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 06:15 PM   #59 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: winchester, VA
Posts: 127
Default

Size 11



34567
sidewall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 06:24 PM   #60 (permalink)
Land of the Potato
 
IdahoFreshies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 1,228
Default

162 is a bit too big like i said. keep it at or under 160. at size 11 you dont need a wide board either just fyi. anything over size 12's is when you need to start being concerned with boot overhang. and even now alot of companies are making bindings with toe lifters on the front of the bindings so you dont have toe drag.
__________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShredLife View Post
do they even make chaps with asses?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
I think they call them pants
IdahoFreshies is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums