![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#82 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Great,
A few notes. The RX is a directional twin while Park Pickle and Carbon Credit are true twins. That is a noticeable difference and we should find out a little more about the riding that you want to do. Rocker boards have less contact length that cambered boards of the same length. To many, they already feel "shorter" than a similar cambered board in the same length. PS: You are looking at an amazing group of decks so all we need to do is narrow down to the best model for your specific needs and choose the perfect size. STOKED! |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4
|
Thank you Wiredsport!...I appreciate all your input. i think I'm going for the arbor element rx 155 cm..and paired with a union contact pro bindings. Based on my understanding of your post, contact points on the rockers are decreased compared to the regular cambers and with that in mind, a 155cm rocketed board will be a good choice for me. This choice of board will probably be perfect for my weight and size, and still be able to achieve my need of manuevarbility and control, speed and lightness and stability of ride....I hope i'm making sense and hopefully i'm right with my analysis and decision.
thank you very much again! |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
[QUOTE=suigeneris1ad;506026]....I hope i'm making sense and hopefully i'm right with my analysis and decision.
QUOTE] That is a great do it all board for your specs. Your understanding of the reduced contact length on rocker boards is correct. Have a great time on your new ride. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|